Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Tests & Review

Yokohama Advan Sport V107 photo, test, review, ratings

Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is an Ultra-High-Performance summer tire with an asymmetrical tread pattern design. It was released in 2023, is available in sizes from 18 to 24 inches in rim diameter, and is suitable for passenger cars and SUVs.

The tire’s primary strength lies in its exceptional dry performance, particularly in handling. It also offers good wet performance and potentially low noise levels. However, concerns exist about its rolling and wear resistance (fuel efficiency). This tire would be best suited for drivers who prioritize dry performance and are willing to compromise fuel efficiency and long-term durability.

The tire replaced the Yokohama Advan Sport V105.

13.3

Average
place

6

Best
place

19

Worst
place

3

times
tested

2023-2025

test
years

Key performance

Overall rating: 90.4% (26 measurements from 3 independent tests)
The overall rating is calculated as the arithmetic average of the average scores for each discipline, to eliminate bias towards disciplines with a large number of tests.

Dry Performance

  • Dry braking

    (3/5)
    Average
    Based on 3 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 4.3th|3-6th range|Rating: 96.9%
    Performance Chart
    • Good: 2 (67%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    • Poor: 1 (33%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 3 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 57.9% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 1 of 3
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 1 of 3
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 1 of 3
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 1 of 3
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:33.5 m (2023 Auto Bild)
    • Worst result:34.68 m (2023 Tyre Reviews UHP)
    • Average result:34 m
    • Max gap to leader:+1.68 m (2023 Tyre Reviews UHP)
  • Dry handling

    (5/5)
    Elite
    Based on 3 tests|1 wins|Avg. pos. 4th|1-7th range|Rating: 99.3%
    Performance Chart
    • Good: 3 (100%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    Detailed Test Results: 3 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 84.2% of competitors per test
    • 🏆 Victories (1st place): 1 of 3
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 1 of 3
    • ✅ No bottom-half finishes
    • ✅ No worst-3 finishes
    • ✅ No last-place finishes

Wet Performance

  • Wet braking

    (2.5/5)
    Average
    Based on 3 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 9.7th|4-19th range|Rating: 91.6%
    Performance Chart
    • Good: 1 (33%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    • Weak: 2 (67%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    Detailed Test Results: 3 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 29.8% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 2 of 3
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 2 of 3
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 1 of 3
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:29.7 m (2023 Tyre Reviews UHP)
    • Worst result:49.6 m (2025 Auto Bild)
    • Average result:39.7 m
    • Max gap to leader:+6.9 m (2025 Auto Bild)
  • Wet handling

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 3 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 9.7th|5-17th range|Rating: 96.7%
    Performance Chart
    • Average: 1 (33%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 2 (67%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    Detailed Test Results: 3 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 34.7% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 2 of 3
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 1 of 3
    • ✅ No last-place finishes
  • Wet lateral handling

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 1 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 20th|20-20th range|Rating: 94.4%
    Performance Chart
    • Poor: 1 (100%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 1 tests analyzed (2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 0% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 1 of 1
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 1 of 1
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 1 of 1

Aquaplaning resistance

  • Straight aqua

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 3 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 13.7th|5-20th range|Rating: 94.8%
    Performance Chart
    • Weak: 2 (67%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    • Poor: 1 (33%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 3 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 13.7% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 3 of 3
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 2 of 3
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 1 of 3
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:103 km/h (2023 Auto Bild)
    • Worst result:76.8 km/h (2023 Tyre Reviews UHP)
    • Average result:86.2 km/h
    • Max gap to leader:-8.1 km/h (2023 Auto Bild)
  • Lateral aqua

    (5/5)
    Elite
    Based on 1 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 5th|5-5th range|Rating: 95.7%
    Performance Chart
    • Good: 1 (100%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    Detailed Test Results: 1 tests analyzed (2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 78.9% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ✅ No bottom-half finishes
    • ✅ No worst-3 finishes
    • ✅ No last-place finishes

Secondary

  • Rolling resistance

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 3 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 15th|5-20th range|Rating: 75.2%
    Performance Chart
    • Weak: 1 (33%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    Detailed Test Results: 3 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 6.7% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 3 of 3
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 3 of 3
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 2 of 3
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:9.99 kg/t (2023 Auto Bild)
    • Worst result:10.62 kg/t (2025 Auto Bild)
    • Average result:10.3 kg/t
    • Max gap to leader:+3 kg/t (2025 Auto Bild)
  • Noise

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 3 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 13.3th|6-19th range|Rating: 97.2%
    Performance Chart
    • Weak: 3 (100%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    Detailed Test Results: 3 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 10.5% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 3 of 3
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 2 of 3
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 1 of 3
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:72.9 dB (2023 Tyre Reviews UHP)
    • Worst result:74.8 dB (2025 Auto Bild)
    • Average result:73.8 dB
    • Max gap to leader:+3.5 dB (2025 Auto Bild)
  • Wear resistance

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 3 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 9.7th|5-15th range|Rating: 62.5%
    Performance Chart
    • Average: 1 (33%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 2 (67%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    Detailed Test Results: 3 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 34.7% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 2 of 3
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 1 of 3
    • ✅ No last-place finishes
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:35890km (2025 Auto Bild)
    • Worst result:20728km (2023 Tyre Reviews UHP)
    • Average result:30072.7km
    • Max gap to leader:-29600km (2023 Auto Bild)

Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Test Results

Independent magazines and organizations have tested the tire multiple times in various sizes. The detailed results from each test are below.

Year
Magazine
Size
Place
Score
2025
Auto Bild
225/40 R18
19 (20)
2023
Auto Bild
225/45 R18
15 (20)
2023
Tyre Reviews UHP
225/40 R18
6 (6)
Track Master

Yokohama Advan Sport V107 vs. Competitors

Yokohama V107 demonstrates a varied performance among its competitors. It excels in dry handling, achieving a top-tier ranking, and performs well in wet braking. However, it falls short in straight aquaplaning and rolling resistance, ranking last in both categories. The tire’s performance in dry braking, wet handling, noise, and wear resistance is mid-range.

Key Statistics

  • ⚠️ Dry braking #9 of 11
  • Dry handling #3 of 11
  • ⚠️ Wet braking #8 of 11
  • ⚠️ Wet handling #9 of 11
  • Wet lateral handling #11 of 11
  • ⚠️ Straight aqua #9 of 11
  • Lateral aqua #3 of 11
  • ⚠️ Noise #9 of 11
  • Rolling resistance #11 of 11
  • ⚠️ Wear resistance #6 of 9
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
99.44%
2.5%
-0.84 m
2
98.21%
1.3%
-0.43 m
3
97.78%
0.9%
-0.29 m
4
97.68%
0.8%
-0.26 m
5
97.45%
0.5%
-0.18 m
6
97.37%
0.5%
-0.15 m
7
97.35%
0.4%
-0.15 m
8
97.29%
0.4%
-0.13 m
9
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
96.90%
10
96.28%
0.6%
+0.20 m
11
91.77%
5.1%
+1.70 m
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
99.82%
0.5%
+0.57 km/h
2
99.44%
0.1%
+0.12 km/h
3
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
99.34%
4
99.12%
0.2%
-0.26 km/h
5
99.09%
0.3%
-0.30 km/h
6
99.02%
0.3%
-0.38 km/h
7
99.00%
0.3%
-0.41 km/h
8
98.77%
0.6%
-0.68 km/h
9
98.50%
0.8%
-1.01 km/h
10
98.25%
1.1%
-1.30 km/h
11
98.05%
1.3%
-1.55 km/h
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
98.97%
7.4%
-3.09 m
2
95.81%
4.2%
-1.77 m
3
95.73%
4.1%
-1.73 m
4
95.14%
3.5%
-1.48 m
5
94.76%
3.2%
-1.33 m
6
92.22%
0.6%
-0.26 m
7
92.21%
0.6%
-0.25 m
8
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
91.61%
9
91.20%
0.4%
+0.17 m
10
90.76%
0.8%
+0.36 m
11
87.19%
4.4%
+1.85 m
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
99.36%
2.6%
+2.11 km/h
2
98.80%
2.1%
+1.66 km/h
3
98.49%
1.8%
+1.42 km/h
4
98.35%
1.6%
+1.30 km/h
5
98.32%
1.6%
+1.28 km/h
6
97.74%
1.0%
+0.81 km/h
7
97.73%
1.0%
+0.81 km/h
8
97.16%
0.4%
+0.34 km/h
9
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
96.72%
10
96.28%
0.4%
-0.36 km/h
11
95.58%
1.1%
-0.91 km/h
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
99.68%
5.3%
2
99.61%
5.2%
3
99.18%
4.8%
4
99.14%
4.7%
5
98.74%
4.3%
6
98.27%
3.9%
7
97.22%
2.8%
8
97.09%
2.7%
9
96.96%
2.5%
10
95.27%
0.9%
11
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
94.42%
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
98.57%
3.8%
+2.74 km/h
2
98.07%
3.3%
+2.38 km/h
3
97.80%
3.0%
+2.18 km/h
4
97.38%
2.6%
+1.87 km/h
5
96.39%
1.6%
+1.15 km/h
6
95.99%
1.2%
+0.86 km/h
7
95.81%
1.0%
+0.72 km/h
8
95.71%
0.9%
+0.65 km/h
9
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
94.82%
10
94.21%
0.6%
-0.44 km/h
11
93.87%
0.9%
-0.69 km/h
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
98.54%
2.9%
2
97.97%
2.3%
3
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
95.65%
4
92.90%
2.8%
5
92.73%
2.9%
6
92.57%
3.1%
7
91.45%
4.2%
8
90.41%
5.2%
9
89.90%
5.8%
10
89.21%
6.4%
11
86.93%
8.7%
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
98.93%
1.7%
-1.24 dB
2
98.39%
1.2%
-0.85 dB
3
98.38%
1.2%
-0.84 dB
4
98.04%
0.8%
-0.60 dB
5
97.85%
0.6%
-0.46 dB
6
97.72%
0.5%
-0.36 dB
7
97.61%
0.4%
-0.28 dB
8
97.50%
0.3%
-0.21 dB
9
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
97.21%
10
96.81%
0.4%
+0.29 dB
11
96.76%
0.5%
+0.32 dB
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
91.05%
15.9%
-1.27 kg/t
2
88.95%
13.8%
-1.10 kg/t
3
88.80%
13.6%
-1.09 kg/t
4
88.70%
13.5%
-1.08 kg/t
5
88.20%
13.0%
-1.04 kg/t
6
85.65%
10.5%
-0.84 kg/t
7
84.57%
9.4%
-0.75 kg/t
8
83.28%
8.1%
-0.65 kg/t
9
82.71%
7.6%
-0.60 kg/t
10
81.62%
6.5%
-0.52 kg/t
11
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
75.16%
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
94.93%
32.5%
+17540 km
2
93.64%
31.2%
+16841 km
3
71.74%
9.3%
+5015 km
4
69.30%
6.8%
+3696 km
5
68.01%
5.6%
+3002 km
6
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
62.45%
7
56.32%
6.1%
-3312 km
8
55.95%
6.5%
-3511 km
9
50.33%
12.1%
-6545 km

Yokohama Advan Sport V107 vs. Market

Comparison of key tire indicators with average market values.

The tire shows lower-than-median results in 7 testing areas while performing better in 3 areas. The most significant advantage is in lateral aqua (+2.30%). The main areas for improvement are rolling resistance (-10.60%) and wet lateral handling (-2.81%).
3 areas above the median
Dry braking (+0.62%)
Dry handling (+0.93%)
Lateral aqua (+2.3%)
7 areas below the median
Wet braking (-0.6%)
Wet handling (-0.43%)
Wet lateral handling (-2.81%)
Straight aqua (-1.15%)
Rolling resistance (-10.6%)
Noise (-1.2%)
Wear resistance (-1.68%)
alltyretests
AllTyreTests.com
Add a comment