Uniroyal MS+ 77 is a Touring Studless winter tire with directional tread pattern, designed for Passenger cars.
The brand Uniroyal are owned to the Continental.
2020 Auto Bild Uniroyal MS plus 77 Test
In 2020 experts of the German magazine Auto Bild have tested the tire at size 245/45 R18 and compared to 19 similar budget, mid-range and premium winter tires. Also they included into the test reference summer tires to compare results.
2019 Auto Bild UHP Uniroyal MS+ 77 Test
Test by the German magazine Auto Bild in 2019. The experts have tested the tire at size 255/35 R19 and compared to 10 similar budget, mid-range and premium UHP winter tires. Also they added into the test set of the reference summer tires to compare results.
2019 Autocenter Uniroyal MS plus 77 Test
Test by the Ukrainian magazine Autocenter in 2019. The experts have tested the Uniroyal at size 205/55 R16 and compared to 9 similar Touring and Premium Touring winter tires.
2018 Auto Bild Uniroyal MS+ 77 Test
In 2018 experts of the German magazine Auto Bild have tested the Uniroyal MS Plus 77 at size 195/65 R15 and compared it with nineteen similar budget, mid-range and premium winter tires. In addition they included into the test reference summer tires to compare results.
2017 Motor Uniroyal MS 77 plus Test
Test by the Polish magazine Motor in 2017. The experts have tested the tire at size 185/65 R16 and compared to 5 similar budget, mid-range and premium winter tires.
Overall Uniroyal MS plus 77 Reviews
1. 2020 Auto Bild (245/45 R18) – 14th place and an expert score “Good”.
Main conclusions:
- Average wet performance.
- Average straight and lateral aquaplaning resistance.
- Average dry braking distance and handling speed.
- Good results on the snow.
- Good noise.
- Low rolling resistance.
2. 2019 Auto Bild UHP (255/35 R19) – 3rd place.
Main conclusions:
- Long dry braking distance and average handling speed.
- Average wet performance.
- Average straight aquaplaning resistance.
- Short snow braking distance and good handling speed.
- Average rolling resistance.
- Relatively low noise.
3. 2019 Autocenter (205/55 R16) – Last place.
Main conclusions:
- The longest dry braking distance and the lowest subjective handling score.
- Long wet braking distance and average handling.
- High straight aquaplaning resistance.
- Long ice braking distance, poor handling and the lowest traction.
- Good results on the snow.
- High noise.
- Average rolling resistance.
4. 2018 Auto Bild (195/65 R15) – 10th place.
Main conclusions:
- Long dry braking distance and poor handling.
- Average wet performance.
- Good straight aquaplaning resistance.
- Good results on the snow.
- Relatively high rolling resistance.
- High noise.
- Average wear resustance.
5. 2017 Motor (185/65 R15) – 3rd place.
Main conclusions:
- Average wet performance.
- High straight and lateral aquaplaning resistance.
- Long dry braking distance and average handling speed.
- Good results on the snow.
- The best comfort.
- Average rolling resistance.
- Average noise.
Similar tyres from the test:
(8 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading...
