Michelin Agilis Alpin

Michelin Agilis Alpin photo, test, review, ratings

Michelin Agilis Alpin is a Premium Touring Winter tire with symmetrical tread pattern, designed for Vans and Light Trucks.

2018 Promobil Michelin Agilis Alpin Test

In 2018 experts of the German publication Promobil have tested Michelin Agilis Alpin at size 225/70 R15C  and compared to 6 similar budget, mid-range and premium winter tires.

Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
4th place in Wet braking. +1.8m braking distance.
Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
6th place in Wet handling. -1.9km/h average handling speed.
Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
5th place in Wet lateral handling. -0.16m/s2 lateral acceleration.
Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
5th place in Straight aqua. -2.2km/h float speed.
Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
4th place in Lateral aqua. -0.39m/s2 average lateral acceleration.
Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
7th place in Dry braking. +3.4m braking distance.
Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
Last place in Dry handling. -1.1km/h average handling speed.
Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
3rd place in Snow braking. +0.3m braking distance.
Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
5th place in Snow handling. -1.3km/h average handling speed.
Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
1-2nd place in Snow traction. +0.02m/s2 snow acceleration.
Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
4-5th place in Rolling resistance. +1.3kg/t rolling resistance.
Michelin Agilis Alpin test, review, ratings
1st place in Noise. -0.3dB external noise.

2016 Husbilen Michelin Agilis Alpin Test

In 2016 experts of the Swedish magazine Husbilen have tested Michelin Agilis Alpin at size 225/70 R15C and compared to 2 similar premium winter tires. Also they included into the test 3 studded premium tires to compare results.

Goodyear Cargo Vector test, review, ratings
2nd place in Wet braking. +0.95m braking distance.
Goodyear Cargo Vector test, review, ratings
2nd place in Wet handling. +0.6sec handling time.
Goodyear Cargo Vector test, review, ratings
3rd place in Dry braking. +0.4m braking distance.
Goodyear Cargo Vector test, review, ratings
2nd place in Subj. Dry handling.
Goodyear Cargo Vector test, review, ratings
2nd place in Ice braking. +0.45m braking distance.
Goodyear Cargo Vector test, review, ratings
2nd place in Ice lateral handling. +0.3sec lap time.
Goodyear Cargo Vector test, review, ratings
3rd place in Snow braking. +0.26m braking distance.
Goodyear Cargo Vector test, review, ratings
3rd place in Snow lateral handling. +4.5sec lap time.
Goodyear Cargo Vector test, review, ratings
3rd place in Snow acceleration. +0.81sec acceleration time.

2013 Autocenter Michelin Agilis AlpinTtest

In 2013 experts of the Ukrainian publication Autocenter have tested Michelin Agilis Alpin at size 215/65 R16C and compared to 7 similar budget, mid-range and premium winter tires.

Michelin Agilis Alpin tests, reviews, ratings
1st place in Wet braking. -1.92m braking distance.
Michelin Agilis Alpin tests, reviews, ratings
4th place in Dry braking. +0.89m braking distance.
Michelin Agilis Alpin tests, reviews, ratings
3rd place in Ice braking. +1.09m braking distance.
Michelin Agilis Alpin tests, reviews, ratings
4th place in Subj. Ice handling. Subjective score – 8 points.
Michelin Agilis Alpin tests, reviews, ratings
4th place in Ice lateral handling. +1.29sec lap time.
Michelin Agilis Alpin tests, reviews, ratings
5-6th place in Ice traction. +0.5sec acceleration time.
Michelin Agilis Alpin tests, reviews, ratings
3rd place in Snow braking. +0.46m braking distance.
Michelin Agilis Alpin tests, reviews, ratings
1-2nd place in Subj. Snow handling.
Michelin Agilis Alpin tests, reviews, ratings
1-2nd place in Snow traction. -0.3sec acceleration time.
Michelin Agilis Alpin tests, reviews, ratings
5th place in Slushplaning. -1.1km/h float speed.
Michelin Agilis Alpin tests, reviews, ratings
3rd place in Rolling resistance. +0.41kg/t rolling resistance.

Overall Michelin Agilis Alpin Review

1. 2018 Promobil (225/70 R15C) – 2-3rd place and an expert score “Conditionally recommended”.

Main conclusions:

  • Short wet braking distance and relatively low handling speed.
  • Average straight and lateral aquaplaning resistance.
  • The worst results on the dry.
  • Short snow braking distance and the best traction, good handling.
  • Good rolling resistance.
  • The best noise.

2. 2016 Husbilen (225/70 R15C) – Last place.

Main conclusions:

  • Good wet performance.
  • Good results on the dry.
  • Average ice braking, handling and acceleration.
  • The worst results on the snow.

3. 2013 Autocenter (215/65 R16C) – 1st place and an expert score “Highly recommended”.

Main conclusions:

  • The shortest wet braking distance.
  • Good dry performance.
  • Average results on the ice.
  • Short snow braking distance, the best handling and traction.
  • Average slushplaning resistance.
  • Low rolling resistance.

Similar tires from the test:

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *