Kleber Krisalp HP2

Kleber Krisalp HP2 photo, test, review

The Kleber Krisalp HP2 is a Touring Winter studless tyre with directional tread, designed for passenger cars.

The tyre has been replaced by the Kleber Krisalp HP3.

The brand Kleber are owned to the French Michelin.

2016 Auto Bild Kleber Krisalp HP2 test

In 2016 experts of the German publication Auto Bild have tested the Kleber Krisalp HP2 at size 205/55 R16 and compared it with nineteen similar budget, mid-range and premium winter tires. In addition, experts included into the test one reference summer tyre for comparison of results.

test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
12-15th place in Wet braking. Same result with Vredestein, Mabor and Fulda. The braking distance was 4.7 meters longer, than the leader.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
17th place in Wet handling. Kleber was 5.6 km/h slower, than the leader.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
17-18th place in Wet lateral handling.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
16th place in Straight aqua. The float speed was 10.4km/h lower, than the leader.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
19th place in Lateral aqua.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
12th place in Dry braking. The braking distance was 1.6 meters longer, than the leader.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
10th place in Dry handling. Kleber was 1km/h slower, than the leader.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
12-14th place in Snow braking. The braking distance was 1.4 meters longer, than the leader. Same result with Pirelli and Fulda.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
11th place in Snow handling. Kleber was 1.9km/h slower, than the leader.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
4th place in Snow traction.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
14-16th place in Snow slalom. Same result with Nokian WR D4 and Bridgestone LM001.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
20th place in Noise level and the worst result.
test Kleber Krisalp HP2 review
8th place in Rolling resistance.

Overall Kleber Krisalp HP2 review

According to the test results Kleber took 11th place and experts score “satisfactorily”.

Main conclusions:

  • Relatively long wet braking distance; low straight and lateral handling.
  • Low aquaplanning resistance.
  • Good dry performance.
  • Good on the snow.
  • The highest noise level.
  • Good rolling resistance.

Similar tyres from the test:

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *