Hankook Winter i*Cept evo2 W320

The Hankook Winter i cept evo2 W320 is an Ultra High Performance studless winter tyre with asymmetrical tread, desogned for Passenger cars.

The tyre also has SUV-version.

The tyre replaced the Hankook W310.

The tire has been replaced by the Hankook Winter i*Cept Evo 3 W330.

2017 AMS Hankook W320 Winter i Cept evo 2 test

In 2017 experts of the German publication Auto Motor und Sport have tested the Hankook Winter i Cept evo2 W320 at size 225/40 R18 and compared it with nine similar mid-range and premium winter tyres.

test Hankook Winter i Cept evo2 W320 review
8th place in Dry braking. The braking distance was 2.2 meters longer, than the leader.
test Hankook Winter i Cept evo2 W320 review
3rd place in Dry handling. Hankook was 0.3 km/h slower, than the leader.
test Hankook Winter i Cept evo2 W320 review
Last place in Wet braking. The braking distance was 4.1 meters longer, than the leader.
test Hankook Winter i Cept evo2 W320 review
8-9th place in Wet handling. Hankook was 4.8 km/h slower, than the leader.
test Hankook W320 Winter i*Cept evo2 review
5th place in Straight aqua. The float speed was 1.7km/h lower, than the leader.
test Hankook W320 Winter i Cept evo2 review
7th place in Snow braking. The braking distance was 1.6 meters longer, than the leader.
test Hankook Winter i Cept evo 2 W320 review
7-8th place in Snow handling. Hankook was 1km/h slower, than the leader.
test Hankook Winter i*Cept evo2 W320 review
5-6th place in Rolling resistance.
test Hankook Winter i*Cept evo2 W320 review
8-9th place in Noise level test.

Overall Hankook Winter i Cept evo2 W320 review

According to the test results Hankook 8th place and got an expert score “recommended with restrictions”.

Main conclusions:

  • Relatively long dry braking, but good handling (one of the best result).
  • Poor wet performance: the longest braking distance and low handling.
  • Average aquaplanning resistance.
  • Relatively low resulst on the snow.
  • Average noise and rollinge resistance.

Similar tyres from the test:

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars (32 votes, average: 3.63 out of 5)
Loading...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *