Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 is a Premium Touring Ice Snow winter tire with a directional tread pattern designed for a wide range of cars, including Passenger, SUV, electric, and hybrid vehicles.
The tire replaced the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2.
2
Average
place
1
Best
place
3
Worst
place
6
times
tested
2023-2025
test
years
Key performance
Dry Performance
-
Dry braking
AverageBased on 6 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 4.5th|3-6th range|Rating: 96.5%Performance Chart
- Average: 4 (67%) A typical result, close to the test average.
- Weak: 2 (33%) The result is noticeably below the average.
Detailed Test Results: 6 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 45.75m 6th / 8 Q3 (Below Avg.) +2.12m +0.38m 1.71m 95.37% -0.23 2025 Tekniikan Maailma205/55 R16 31.5m 5th / 7 Q3 (Below Avg.) +0.7m +0.1m 1.4m 97.78% +0.02 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 48.5m 4th / 5 Q4 (Worst 25%) +3.2m +0.8m 3.1m 93.4% -0.96 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 32.1m 4th / 7 Q2 (Good) +0.9m 0m 1.26m 97.2% -0.2 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 30.9m 5th / 7 Q3 (Below Avg.) +0.87m +0.25m 0.64m 97.18% -0.52 2023 Moottori205/55 R16 31.25m 3rd / 4 Q3 (Below Avg.) +0.58m +0.06m 0.64m 98.14% -0.09 Show 1 older results... Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 33.9% of competitors per test
- ➖ No first-place finishes
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 1 of 6
- ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 6 of 6
- ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 3 of 6
- ✅ No last-place finishes
Results in numbers
- Best result:30.9 m (2023 Vi Bilagare)
- Worst result:48.5 m (2025 Tyre Reviews)
- Average result:36.7 m
- Typical gap to leader:+0.7 – +2.12 m
- Max gap to leader:+3.2 m (2025 Tyre Reviews)
Wet Performance
-
Wet braking
ExemplaryBased on 6 tests|3 wins|Avg. pos. 2.2th|1-4th range|Rating: 96.3%Performance Chart
- Exemplary: 2 (33%) Outstanding result, significantly better than the test average.
- Good: 2 (33%) A solid performance, clearly above the average.
- Average: 2 (33%) A typical result, close to the test average.
Detailed Test Results: 6 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 50.35m 4th / 8 Q2 (Good) +3.86m -1.21m 3.47m 92.33% +0.31 2025 Tekniikan Maailma205/55 R16 37.7m 3rd / 7 Q2 (Good) +0.2m -0.2m 2m 99.47% +0.75 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 43.7m 3rd / 5 Q2 (Good) +6m 0m 5.25m 86.27% -0.29 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 37.55m 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -2.81m 3.38m 100% +1.74 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 37.55m 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -3.19m 3.79m 100% +1.46 2023 Moottori205/55 R16 38.49m 1st / 4 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -3.03m 2.79m 100% +1.56 Show 1 older results... Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 79% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 3 of 6
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 5 of 6
- ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 1 of 6
- ✅ No worst-3 finishes
- ✅ No last-place finishes
Results in numbers
- Best result:37.55 m (2024 Vi Bilagare)
- Worst result:50.35 m (2025 Vi Bilagare)
- Average result:40.9 m
- Max gap to leader:+6 m (2025 Tyre Reviews)
-
Wet handling
EliteBased on 6 tests|5 wins|Avg. pos. 1.3th|1-3th range|Rating: 99.5%Performance Chart
- Good: 5 (83%) A solid performance, clearly above the average.
- Average: 1 (17%) A typical result, close to the test average.
Detailed Test Results: 6 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 61.6sec 1st / 8 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -1.8sec 2.15sec 100% +1.47 2025 Tekniikan Maailma205/55 R16 39.9sec 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.7sec 1.8sec 100% +1.21 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 93.51sec 3rd / 5 Q2 (Good) +2.87sec 0sec 5.73sec 96.93% +0.36 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 40.6sec 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -1.1sec 2.7sec 100% +1.31 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 41sec 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -1.1sec 1.4sec 100% +1.4 2023 Moottori205/55 R16 40.4sec 1st / 4 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -1.4sec 1.6sec 100% +1.44 Show 1 older results... Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 91.7% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 5 of 6
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 6 of 6
- ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 1 of 6
- ✅ No worst-3 finishes
- ✅ No last-place finishes
Aquaplaning resistance
-
Straight aqua
EliteBased on 4 tests|3 wins|Avg. pos. 1.3th|1-2th range|Rating: 99%Performance Chart
- Exemplary: 3 (75%) Outstanding result, significantly better than the test average.
- Good: 1 (25%) A solid performance, clearly above the average.
Detailed Test Results: 4 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 67.5km/h 2nd / 8 Q1 (Top 25%) -2.7km/h +1.3km/h 2km/h 96.15% +0.57 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 60.4km/h 1st / 5 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 +3.1km/h 3.05km/h 100% +1.71 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 68.5km/h 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 +6.1km/h 4.9km/h 100% +1.87 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 66km/h 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 +4.6km/h 4.5km/h 100% +1.68 Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 96.4% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 3 of 4
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 4 of 4
- ✅ No bottom-half finishes
- ✅ No worst-3 finishes
- ✅ No last-place finishes
Results in numbers
- Best result:68.5 km/h (2024 Vi Bilagare)
- Worst result:60.4 km/h (2025 Tyre Reviews)
- Average result:65.6 km/h
- Max gap to leader:-2.7 km/h (2025 Vi Bilagare)
-
Lateral aqua
EliteBased on 1 tests|1 wins|Avg. pos. 1th|1-1th range|Rating: 100%Performance Chart
- Exemplary: 1 (100%) Outstanding result, significantly better than the test average.
Detailed Test Results: 1 tests analyzed (2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 2.02m/s2 1st / 5 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 +0.33m/s2 0.34m/s2 100% +1.7 Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 100% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 1 of 1
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 1 of 1
- ✅ No bottom-half finishes
- ✅ No worst-3 finishes
- ✅ No last-place finishes
Snow Performance
-
Snow braking
ExemplaryBased on 6 tests|4 wins|Avg. pos. 2.2th|1-6th range|Rating: 99.7%Performance Chart
- Exemplary: 1 (17%) Outstanding result, significantly better than the test average.
- Good: 3 (50%) A solid performance, clearly above the average.
- Average: 2 (33%) A typical result, close to the test average.
Detailed Test Results: 6 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 12.14m 6th / 8 Q3 (Below Avg.) +0.13m +0.04m 0.12m 98.93% -0.47 2025 Tekniikan Maailma205/55 R16 49.8m 3rd / 7 Q2 (Good) +0.3m -0.1m 0.7m 99.4% +0.48 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 16.44m 1st / 5 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.23m 0.41m 100% +1.36 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 12.43m 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.29m 0.34m 100% +1.22 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 12.19m 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.15m 0.31m 100% +1.09 2023 Moottori205/55 R16 11.28m 1st / 4 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.26m 0.17m 100% +1.71 Show 1 older results... Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 82.5% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 4 of 6
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 5 of 6
- ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 1 of 6
- ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 1 of 6
- ✅ No last-place finishes
Results in numbers
- Best result:11.28 m (2023 Moottori)
- Worst result:49.8 m (2025 Tekniikan Maailma)
- Average result:19 m
- Max gap to leader:+0.3 m (2025 Tekniikan Maailma)
-
Snow handling
EliteBased on 5 tests|2 wins|Avg. pos. 2th|1-3th range|Rating: 99.7%Performance Chart
- Good: 5 (100%) A solid performance, clearly above the average.
Detailed Test Results: 5 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 69.6sec 3rd / 8 Q2 (Good) +0.4sec -0.35sec 0.9sec 99.43% +0.69 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 79.64sec 1st / 5 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -1sec 2.08sec 100% +1.12 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 79.6sec 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -1.4sec 2.1sec 100% +1.08 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 75.9sec 3rd / 7 Q2 (Good) +0.4sec -0.5sec 1sec 99.47% +0.56 2023 Moottori205/55 R16 83.28sec 2nd / 4 Q2 (Good) +0.24sec -0.38sec 1.46sec 99.71% +0.73 Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 81% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 2 of 5
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 5 of 5
- ✅ No bottom-half finishes
- ✅ No worst-3 finishes
- ✅ No last-place finishes
-
Snow traction
GoodBased on 6 tests|2 wins|Avg. pos. 2th|1-3th range|Rating: 98.6%Performance Chart
- Exemplary: 2 (33%) Outstanding result, significantly better than the test average.
- Average: 4 (67%) A typical result, close to the test average.
Detailed Test Results: 6 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 1.93sec 3rd / 8 Q2 (Good) +0.03sec 0sec 0.02sec 98.45% -0.1 2025 Tekniikan Maailma205/55 R16 6sec 3rd / 7 Q2 (Good) +0.2sec 0sec 0.1sec 96.67% -0.32 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 3.08sec 2nd / 5 Q2 (Good) +0.08sec -0.04sec 0.12sec 97.4% +0.37 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 4.04sec 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.16sec 0.11sec 100% +1.62 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 4.44sec 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.13sec 0.1sec 100% +1.64 2023 Moottori205/55 R16 4.39sec 2nd / 4 Q2 (Good) +0.05sec -0.03sec 0.09sec 98.86% +0.44 Show 1 older results... Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 80% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 2 of 6
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 6 of 6
- ✅ No bottom-half finishes
- ✅ No worst-3 finishes
- ✅ No last-place finishes
Ice Performance
-
Ice braking
GoodBased on 6 tests|1 wins|Avg. pos. 3.7th|1-6th range|Rating: 93.5%Performance Chart
- Good: 2 (33%) A solid performance, clearly above the average.
- Average: 4 (67%) A typical result, close to the test average.
Detailed Test Results: 6 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 11.99m 6th / 8 Q3 (Below Avg.) +0.29m +0.1m 0.65m 97.58% +0.34 2025 Tekniikan Maailma205/55 R16 50.2m 5th / 7 Q3 (Below Avg.) +4.6m +2.3m 6.2m 90.84% -0.3 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 7.29m 2nd / 5 Q2 (Good) +0.32m -0.02m 1.37m 95.61% +0.65 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 12.75m 4th / 7 Q2 (Good) +2.06m 0m 4.31m 83.84% +0.39 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 13m 4th / 7 Q2 (Good) +0.91m 0m 0.98m 93% -0.15 2023 Moottori205/55 R16 14.75m 1st / 4 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.41m 0.73m 100% +1.15 Show 1 older results... Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 56.2% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 1 of 6
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 2 of 6
- ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 4 of 6
- ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 1 of 6
- ✅ No last-place finishes
Results in numbers
- Best result:7.29 m (2025 Tyre Reviews)
- Worst result:50.2 m (2025 Tekniikan Maailma)
- Average result:18.3 m
- Typical gap to leader:+0.31 – +3.33 m
- Max gap to leader:+4.6 m (2025 Tekniikan Maailma)
-
Ice handling
GoodBased on 5 tests|2 wins|Avg. pos. 2.6th|1-5th range|Rating: 78.3%Performance Chart
- Good: 2 (40%) A solid performance, clearly above the average.
- Average: 3 (60%) A typical result, close to the test average.
Detailed Test Results: 5 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 58.6sec 3rd / 9 Q2 (Good) +58.6sec -0.7sec 3.45sec 0% -0.28 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 54.53sec 1st / 5 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.46sec 2.31sec 100% +1 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 66.4sec 3rd / 7 Q2 (Good) +1.8sec -0.6sec 4.3sec 97.29% +0.39 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 46.7sec 5th / 7 Q3 (Below Avg.) +2.7sec +0.7sec 2.6sec 94.22% -0.48 2023 Moottori205/55 R16 69.76sec 1st / 4 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.8sec 4.32sec 100% +0.74 Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 75% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 2 of 5
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 4 of 5
- ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 1 of 5
- ✅ No worst-3 finishes
- ✅ No last-place finishes
-
Ice traction
GoodBased on 6 tests|1 wins|Avg. pos. 3.5th|1-5th range|Rating: 92.7%Performance Chart
- Good: 3 (50%) A solid performance, clearly above the average.
- Average: 3 (50%) A typical result, close to the test average.
Detailed Test Results: 6 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 5.29sec 4th / 8 Q2 (Good) +0.06sec -0.08sec 0.32sec 98.87% +0.51 2025 Tekniikan Maailma205/55 R16 7.2sec 4th / 7 Q2 (Good) +0.9sec 0sec 0.9sec 87.5% -0.1 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 6.5sec 3rd / 5 Q2 (Good) +0.04sec 0sec 1.4sec 99.38% +0.75 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 8.99sec 4th / 7 Q2 (Good) +1.46sec 0sec 2.99sec 83.76% +0.39 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 8.43sec 5th / 7 Q3 (Below Avg.) +1.11sec +0.38sec 1.45sec 86.83% -0.38 2023 Moottori205/55 R16 6.39sec 1st / 4 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.42sec 0.44sec 100% +1.5 Show 1 older results... Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 56.7% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 1 of 6
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 2 of 6
- ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 4 of 6
- ✅ No worst-3 finishes
- ✅ No last-place finishes
Secondary
-
Rolling resistance
ExemplaryBased on 4 tests|2 wins|Avg. pos. 2th|1-3th range|Rating: 98.6%Performance Chart
- Exemplary: 1 (25%) Outstanding result, significantly better than the test average.
- Good: 2 (50%) A solid performance, clearly above the average.
- Average: 1 (25%) A typical result, close to the test average.
Detailed Test Results: 4 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 6.35kg/t 3rd / 8 Q2 (Good) +0.1kg/t -0.03kg/t 0.08kg/t 98.43% +0.27 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 7.59kg/t 3rd / 5 Q2 (Good) +0.3kg/t 0kg/t 1.46kg/t 96.05% +0.51 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 5.25kg/t 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.15kg/t 0.25kg/t 100% +1.27 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 4.85kg/t 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.2kg/t 0.25kg/t 100% +1.57 Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 80.4% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 2 of 4
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 4 of 4
- ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 1 of 4
- ✅ No worst-3 finishes
- ✅ No last-place finishes
Results in numbers
- Best result:4.85 kg/t (2023 Vi Bilagare)
- Worst result:7.59 kg/t (2025 Tyre Reviews)
- Average result:6 kg/t
- Max gap to leader:+0.3 kg/t (2025 Tyre Reviews)
-
Noise
EliteBased on 4 tests|2 wins|Avg. pos. 1.8th|1-3th range|Rating: 99.8%Performance Chart
- Exemplary: 1 (25%) Outstanding result, significantly better than the test average.
- Good: 2 (50%) A solid performance, clearly above the average.
- Average: 1 (25%) A typical result, close to the test average.
Detailed Test Results: 4 tests analyzed (2023-2025)Test / Size Res Place Qrtl Diff. Median IQR Score Z-sc. 2025 Vi Bilagare235/60 R18 68.6dB 1st / 8 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.75dB 0.75dB 100% +1.39 2025 Tyre Reviews205/55 R16 69.3dB 2nd / 5 Q2 (Good) +0.2dB -0.3dB 2.45dB 99.71% +0.83 2024 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 71.5dB 1st / 7 Q1 (Top 25%) 🏆 -0.3dB 0.3dB 100% +1.67 2023 Vi Bilagare225/45 R17 74dB 3rd / 7 Q2 (Good) +0.3dB 0dB 0.4dB 99.59% +0.39 Key statistics
- Typically outperforms 85.4% of competitors per test
- 🏆 Victories (1st place): 2 of 4
- ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 4 of 4
- ✅ No bottom-half finishes
- ✅ No worst-3 finishes
- ✅ No last-place finishes
Results in numbers
- Best result:68.6 dB (2025 Vi Bilagare)
- Worst result:74 dB (2023 Vi Bilagare)
- Average result:70.9 dB
- Max gap to leader:+0.3 dB (2023 Vi Bilagare)
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 Test History
Independent magazines and organizations have tested the tire multiple times in various sizes. The detailed results from each test are below.
2025 Vi Bilagare (235/60 R18)
The tyre placed 3rd overall.
Performance Summary
| Discipline | Place | Diff. | Perf. | Z-Sc. | Rat. | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking |
6th of 8 | +2.12m | 95.4% | -0.23 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Wet braking |
4th of 8 | +3.86m | 92.3% | 0.31 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Wet handling |
🏆 1st of 8 | -0.4s | 100% | 1.47 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Straight aqua |
2nd of 8 | -2.7km/h | 96.2% | 0.57 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Snow braking |
6th of 8 | +0.13m | 98.9% | -0.47 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Snow handling |
3rd of 8 | +0.4s | 99.4% | 0.69 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Snow traction |
3rd of 8 | +0.03s | 98.4% | -0.1 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Ice braking |
6th of 8 | +0.29m | 97.6% | 0.34 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Ice handling |
3rd of 9 | +58.6s | 0% | -0.28 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Ice traction |
4th of 8 | +0.06s | 98.9% | 0.51 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Rolling resistance |
3rd of 8 | +0.1km | 98.4% | 0.27 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Noise |
🏆 1st of 8 | -0.1dB | 100% | 1.39 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Detailed Results
Dry braking
Dry braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Pirelli Ice Friction43.63m
-
2 Continental VikingContact 844.41m
-
3 Nordman North RS3 SUV44.96m
-
4 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X45.13m
-
5 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV45.62m
-
6 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 345.75m
-
7 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV47.03m
-
8 Maxtrek Trek M7+47.36m
6th of 8, +2.12m longer braking distance, 95.4% rating
Wet braking
Wet braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV46.49m
-
2 Pirelli Ice Friction48.85m
-
3 Continental VikingContact 850.3m
-
4 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 350.35m
-
5 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV52.76m
-
6 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X52.81m
-
7 Nordman North RS3 SUV53.29m
-
8 Maxtrek Trek M7+53.78m
4th of 8, +3.86m longer braking distance, 92.3% rating
Wet handling
Wet handling time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 361.6s
-
2 Pirelli Ice Friction62s
-
3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV62.6s
-
4 Continental VikingContact 862.9s
-
5 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV63.9s
-
6 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X64.2s
-
7 Nordman North RS3 SUV64.7s
-
8 Maxtrek Trek M7+65.2s
1st of 8, -0.4s faster, 100% rating
Straight aqua
Float speed in km/h
-
1 Pirelli Ice Friction70.2km/h
-
2 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 367.5km/h
-
3 Continental VikingContact 867.1km/h
-
4 Maxtrek Trek M7+66.2km/h
-
5 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV66.2km/h
-
6 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X65.8km/h
-
7 Nordman North RS3 SUV64.8km/h
-
8 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV64.7km/h
2nd of 8, -2.7km/h slower, 96.2% rating
Snow braking
Snow braking at 35km/h in meters
-
1 Pirelli Ice Friction12.01m
-
2 Maxtrek Trek M7+12.04m
-
3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV12.04m
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV12.1m
-
5 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X12.11m
-
6 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 312.14m
-
7 Continental VikingContact 812.17m
-
8 Nordman North RS3 SUV12.24m
6th of 8, +0.13m longer braking distance, 98.9% rating
Snow handling
Snow handling time in seconds
-
1 Continental VikingContact 869.2s
-
2 Pirelli Ice Friction69.5s
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 369.6s
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV69.7s
-
5 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV70.2s
-
6 Nordman North RS3 SUV70.2s
-
7 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X70.7s
-
8 Maxtrek Trek M7+71.3s
3rd of 8, +0.4s slower, 99.4% rating
Snow traction
Snow acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Pirelli Ice Friction1.9s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 81.92s
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 31.93s
-
4 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X1.93s
-
5 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV1.93s
-
6 Maxtrek Trek M7+1.94s
-
7 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV1.94s
-
8 Nordman North RS3 SUV1.94s
3rd of 8, +0.03s slower, 98.4% rating
Ice braking
Ice braking at 25km/h in meters
-
1 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV11.7m
-
2 Continental VikingContact 811.76m
-
3 Nordman North RS3 SUV11.77m
-
4 Pirelli Ice Friction11.87m
-
5 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV11.92m
-
6 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 311.99m
-
7 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X12.85m
-
8 Maxtrek Trek M7+14.7m
6th of 8, +0.29m longer braking distance, 97.6% rating
Ice handling
Ice handling time in seconds
-
1 Nordman North RS3 SUV0s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 856.9s
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 358.6s
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV59.3s
-
5 Pirelli Ice Friction59.4s
-
6 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV60s
-
7 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X62.4s
-
8 Maxtrek Trek M7+63.2s
3rd of 9, +58.6s slower, 0% rating
Ice traction
Ice acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV5.23s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 85.24s
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV5.27s
-
4 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 35.29s
-
5 Pirelli Ice Friction5.44s
-
6 Nordman North RS3 SUV5.45s
-
7 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X5.7s
-
8 Maxtrek Trek M7+7.14s
4th of 8, +0.06s slower, 98.9% rating
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption in l/100km
-
1 Nordman North RS3 SUV6.25km
-
2 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X6.3km
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 36.35km
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV6.35km
-
5 Maxtrek Trek M7+6.4km
-
6 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV6.4km
-
7 Pirelli Ice Friction6.4km
-
8 Continental VikingContact 86.5km
3rd of 8, +0.1km worse, 98.4% rating
Noise
External noise in dB
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 368.6dB
-
2 Michelin X Ice Snow SUV68.7dB
-
3 Continental VikingContact 869.1dB
-
4 Maxtrek Trek M7+69.1dB
-
5 Hankook Winter i cept IZ3 X69.6dB
-
6 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV69.6dB
-
7 Nordman North RS3 SUV69.7dB
-
8 Pirelli Ice Friction70.3dB
1st of 8, -0.1dB quieter, 100% rating
2025 Tekniikan Maailma (205/55 R16)
The tyre placed 3rd overall.
Performance Summary
| Discipline | Place | Diff. | Perf. | Z-Sc. | Rat. | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking |
5th of 7 | +0.7m | 97.8% | 0.02 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Wet braking |
3rd of 7 | +0.2m | 99.5% | 0.75 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Wet handling |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.1s | 100% | 1.21 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Snow braking |
3rd of 7 | +0.3m | 99.4% | 0.48 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Snow traction |
3rd of 7 | +0.2s | 96.7% | -0.32 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Ice braking |
5th of 7 | +4.6m | 90.8% | -0.3 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Ice traction |
4th of 7 | +0.9s | 87.5% | -0.1 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Detailed Results
Dry braking
Dry braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Falken Winterpeak F-Snow 130.8m
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R530.8m
-
3 Hankook Winter i cept IZ331.3m
-
4 Continental VikingContact 831.4m
-
5 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 331.5m
-
6 Michelin X Ice Snow32.2m
-
7 Radar Dimax Ice32.6m
5th of 7, +0.7m longer braking distance, 97.8% rating
Wet braking
Wet braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Falken Winterpeak F-Snow 137.5m
-
2 Hankook Winter i cept IZ337.5m
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 337.7m
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R537.9m
-
5 Radar Dimax Ice39.4m
-
6 Continental VikingContact 839.5m
-
7 Michelin X Ice Snow41.1m
3rd of 7, +0.2m longer braking distance, 99.5% rating
Wet handling
Wet handling time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 339.9s
-
2 Hankook Winter i cept IZ340s
-
3 Continental VikingContact 840.3s
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R540.6s
-
5 Falken Winterpeak F-Snow 141.4s
-
6 Michelin X Ice Snow41.8s
-
7 Radar Dimax Ice41.8s
1st of 7, -0.1s faster, 100% rating
Snow braking
Snow braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R549.5m
-
2 Continental VikingContact 849.6m
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 349.8m
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow49.9m
-
5 Radar Dimax Ice50.2m
-
6 Falken Winterpeak F-Snow 150.3m
-
7 Hankook Winter i cept IZ350.4m
3rd of 7, +0.3m longer braking distance, 99.4% rating
Snow traction
Snow acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Continental VikingContact 85.8s
-
2 Falken Winterpeak F-Snow 15.9s
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 36s
-
4 Hankook Winter i cept IZ36s
-
5 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R56s
-
6 Radar Dimax Ice6s
-
7 Michelin X Ice Snow6.1s
3rd of 7, +0.2s slower, 96.7% rating
Ice braking
Ice braking at 50km/h in meters
-
1 Michelin X Ice Snow45.6m
-
2 Continental VikingContact 847.1m
-
3 Falken Winterpeak F-Snow 147.9m
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R547.9m
-
5 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 350.2m
-
6 Radar Dimax Ice53.3m
-
7 Hankook Winter i cept IZ353.5m
5th of 7, +4.6m longer braking distance, 90.8% rating
Ice traction
Ice acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Continental VikingContact 86.3s
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R56.7s
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow6.8s
-
4 Falken Winterpeak F-Snow 17.2s
-
5 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 37.2s
-
6 Hankook Winter i cept IZ37.6s
-
7 Radar Dimax Ice8.2s
4th of 7, +0.9s slower, 87.5% rating
2025 Tyre Reviews (205/55 R16)
The tyre placed 2nd overall, earning an expert rating of "Highly Recommended".
Performance Summary
| Discipline | Place | Diff. | Perf. | Z-Sc. | Rat. | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking |
4th of 5 | +3.2m | 93.4% | -0.96 | Weak | Below average, noticeable shortcoming compared to most competitors. |
Dry handling |
2nd of 5 | +0.3s | 99.5% | 0.57 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Wet braking |
3rd of 5 | +6m | 86.3% | -0.29 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Wet handling |
3rd of 5 | +2.87s | 96.9% | 0.36 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Straight aqua |
🏆 1st of 5 | 1.9km/h | 100% | 1.71 | Exemplary | Significant advantage over competitors. |
Lateral aqua |
🏆 1st of 5 | 0.23m/s² | 100% | 1.7 | Exemplary | Significant advantage over competitors. |
Snow braking |
🏆 1st of 5 | -0.23m | 100% | 1.36 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Snow handling |
🏆 1st of 5 | -0.56s | 100% | 1.12 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Snow traction |
2nd of 5 | +0.08s | 97.4% | 0.37 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Ice braking |
2nd of 5 | +0.32m | 95.6% | 0.65 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Ice handling |
🏆 1st of 5 | -0.23s | 100% | 1 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Ice traction |
3rd of 5 | +0.04s | 99.4% | 0.75 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Rolling resistance |
3rd of 5 | +0.3kg/t | 96% | 0.51 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Noise |
2nd of 5 | +0.2dB | 99.7% | 0.83 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Detailed Results
Dry braking
Dry braking at 100km/h in meters
-
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R545.3m
-
2 Continental VikingContact 845.6m
-
3 Marshal I*ZEN KW3147.7m
-
4 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 348.5m
-
5 Michelin X Ice Snow48.6m
4th of 5, +3.2m longer braking distance, 93.4% rating
Dry handling
Dry handling time in seconds
-
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R558.1s
-
2 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 358.4s
-
3 Continental VikingContact 858.5s
-
4 Marshal I*ZEN KW3159s
-
5 Michelin X Ice Snow59s
2nd of 5, +0.3s slower, 99.5% rating
Wet braking
Wet braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R537.7m
-
2 Continental VikingContact 842.4m
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 343.7m
-
4 Marshal I*ZEN KW3144.4m
-
5 Michelin X Ice Snow46.2m
3rd of 5, +6m longer braking distance, 86.3% rating
Wet handling
Wet handling time in seconds
-
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R590.64s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 893.12s
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 393.51s
-
4 Marshal I*ZEN KW3197.2s
-
5 Michelin X Ice Snow98.01s
3rd of 5, +2.87s slower, 96.9% rating
Straight aqua
Float speed in km/h
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 360.4km/h
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R558.5km/h
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow57.3km/h
-
4 Continental VikingContact 856.6km/h
-
5 Marshal I*ZEN KW3156.2km/h
1st of 5, +1.9km/h faster, 100% rating
Lateral aqua
Remaining lateral acceleration in m/s2
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 32.02m/s²
-
2 Marshal I*ZEN KW311.79m/s²
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow1.69m/s²
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R51.63m/s²
-
5 Continental VikingContact 81.51m/s²
1st of 5, +0.23m/s² better, 100% rating
Snow braking
Snow braking at 40km/h in meters
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 316.44m
-
2 Michelin X Ice Snow16.67m
-
3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R516.67m
-
4 Continental VikingContact 816.81m
-
5 Marshal I*ZEN KW3117.11m
1st of 5, -0.23m shorter braking distance, 100% rating
Snow handling
Snow handling time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 379.64s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 880.2s
-
3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R580.64s
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow81.06s
-
5 Marshal I*ZEN KW3182.94s
1st of 5, -0.56s faster, 100% rating
Snow traction
Snow acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Continental VikingContact 83s
-
2 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 33.08s
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow3.12s
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R53.13s
-
5 Marshal I*ZEN KW313.18s
2nd of 5, +0.08s slower, 97.4% rating
Ice braking
Ice braking at 20km/h in meters
-
1 Michelin X Ice Snow6.97m
-
2 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 37.29m
-
3 Continental VikingContact 87.31m
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R58.41m
-
5 Marshal I*ZEN KW318.59m
2nd of 5, +0.32m longer braking distance, 95.6% rating
Ice handling
Ice handling time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 354.53s
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R554.76s
-
3 Continental VikingContact 854.99s
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow56.59s
-
5 Marshal I*ZEN KW3157.31s
1st of 5, -0.23s faster, 100% rating
Ice traction
Ice acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Michelin X Ice Snow6.46s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 86.48s
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 36.5s
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R57.54s
-
5 Marshal I*ZEN KW318.2s
3rd of 5, +0.04s slower, 99.4% rating
Rolling resistance
Rolling resistance in kg/t
-
1 Continental VikingContact 87.29kg/t
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R57.48kg/t
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 37.59kg/t
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow8.14kg/t
-
5 Marshal I*ZEN KW319.55kg/t
3rd of 5, +0.3kg/t higher rolling resistance, 96% rating
Noise
External noise in dB
-
1 Continental VikingContact 869.1dB
-
2 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 369.3dB
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow69.6dB
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R571.5dB
-
5 Marshal I*ZEN KW3171.8dB
2nd of 5, +0.2dB louder, 99.7% rating
2024 Vi Bilagare (225/45 R17)
The tyre placed 1st overall.
Performance Summary
| Discipline | Place | Diff. | Perf. | Z-Sc. | Rat. | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking |
4th of 7 | +0.9m | 97.2% | -0.2 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Wet braking |
🏆 1st of 7 | -1.55m | 100% | 1.74 | Exemplary | Significant advantage over competitors. |
Wet handling |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.6s | 100% | 1.31 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Straight aqua |
🏆 1st of 7 | 3.8km/h | 100% | 1.87 | Exemplary | Significant advantage over competitors. |
Snow braking |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.03m | 100% | 1.22 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Snow handling |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.1s | 100% | 1.08 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Snow traction |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.15s | 100% | 1.62 | Exemplary | Significant advantage over competitors. |
Ice braking |
4th of 7 | +2.06m | 83.8% | 0.39 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Ice handling |
3rd of 7 | +1.8s | 97.3% | 0.39 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Ice traction |
4th of 7 | +1.46s | 83.8% | 0.39 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Rolling resistance |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.05km | 100% | 1.27 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Noise |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.2dB | 100% | 1.67 | Exemplary | Significant advantage over competitors. |
Detailed Results
Dry braking
Dry braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Continental VikingContact 831.2m
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R531.35m
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow31.57m
-
4 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 332.1m
-
5 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W61632.37m
-
6 Radar Dimax Ice32.61m
-
7 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 1532.72m
4th of 7, +0.9m longer braking distance, 97.2% rating
Wet braking
Wet braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 337.55m
-
2 Michelin X Ice Snow39.1m
-
3 Continental VikingContact 840.1m
-
4 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W61640.36m
-
5 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R541.92m
-
6 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 1542.48m
-
7 Radar Dimax Ice42.66m
1st of 7, -1.55m shorter braking distance, 100% rating
Wet handling
Wet handling time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 340.6s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 841.2s
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow41.7s
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R541.7s
-
5 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W61642.5s
-
6 Radar Dimax Ice43.9s
-
7 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 1544.3s
1st of 7, -0.6s faster, 100% rating
Straight aqua
Float speed in km/h
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 368.5km/h
-
2 Michelin X Ice Snow64.7km/h
-
3 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 1563.3km/h
-
4 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W61662.4km/h
-
5 Continental VikingContact 859.8km/h
-
6 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R559.8km/h
-
7 Radar Dimax Ice58.2km/h
1st of 7, +3.8km/h faster, 100% rating
Snow braking
Snow braking at 35km/h in meters
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 312.43m
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R512.46m
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow12.5m
-
4 Continental VikingContact 812.72m
-
5 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W61612.73m
-
6 Radar Dimax Ice12.8m
-
7 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 1512.98m
1st of 7, -0.03m shorter braking distance, 100% rating
Snow handling
Snow handling time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 379.6s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 879.7s
-
3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R579.7s
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow81s
-
5 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W61681.5s
-
6 Radar Dimax Ice81.8s
-
7 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 1583s
1st of 7, -0.1s faster, 100% rating
Snow traction
Snow acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 34.04s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 84.19s
-
3 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W6164.2s
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R54.2s
-
5 Michelin X Ice Snow4.23s
-
6 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 154.3s
-
7 Radar Dimax Ice4.46s
1st of 7, -0.15s faster, 100% rating
Ice braking
Ice braking at 25km/h in meters
-
1 Michelin X Ice Snow10.69m
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R511.37m
-
3 Continental VikingContact 811.97m
-
4 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 312.75m
-
5 Radar Dimax Ice15.56m
-
6 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W61615.68m
-
7 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 1518.38m
4th of 7, +2.06m longer braking distance, 83.8% rating
Ice handling
Ice handling time in seconds
-
1 Continental VikingContact 864.6s
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R565s
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 366.4s
-
4 Radar Dimax Ice67s
-
5 Michelin X Ice Snow67.8s
-
6 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W61669.3s
-
7 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 1569.7s
3rd of 7, +1.8s slower, 97.3% rating
Ice traction
Ice acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Michelin X Ice Snow7.53s
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R58.01s
-
3 Continental VikingContact 88.44s
-
4 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 38.99s
-
5 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W61611s
-
6 Radar Dimax Ice11s
-
7 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 1513s
4th of 7, +1.46s slower, 83.8% rating
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption in l/100km
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 35.25km
-
2 Continental VikingContact 85.3km
-
3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R55.3km
-
4 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W6165.4km
-
5 Michelin X Ice Snow5.45km
-
6 Radar Dimax Ice5.55km
-
7 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 155.6km
1st of 7, -0.05km better, 100% rating
Noise
External noise in dB
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 371.5dB
-
2 Greenmax LL Winter Ice I 1571.7dB
-
3 Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W61671.7dB
-
4 Continental VikingContact 871.8dB
-
5 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R571.9dB
-
6 Radar Dimax Ice72dB
-
7 Michelin X Ice Snow72.1dB
1st of 7, -0.2dB quieter, 100% rating
2023 Vi Bilagare (225/45 R17)
The tyre placed 2nd overall.
Performance Summary
| Discipline | Place | Diff. | Perf. | Z-Sc. | Rat. | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking |
5th of 7 | +0.87m | 97.2% | -0.52 | Weak | Below average, noticeable shortcoming compared to most competitors. |
Wet braking |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.85m | 100% | 1.46 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Wet handling |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.4s | 100% | 1.4 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Straight aqua |
🏆 1st of 7 | 1km/h | 100% | 1.68 | Exemplary | Significant advantage over competitors. |
Snow braking |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.02m | 100% | 1.09 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Snow handling |
3rd of 7 | +0.4s | 99.5% | 0.56 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Snow traction |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.05s | 100% | 1.64 | Exemplary | Significant advantage over competitors. |
Ice braking |
4th of 7 | +0.91m | 93% | -0.15 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Ice handling |
5th of 7 | +2.7s | 94.2% | -0.48 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Ice traction |
5th of 7 | +1.11s | 86.8% | -0.38 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Rolling resistance |
🏆 1st of 7 | -0.05km | 100% | 1.57 | Exemplary | Significant advantage over competitors. |
Noise |
3rd of 7 | +0.3dB | 99.6% | 0.39 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Detailed Results
Dry braking
Dry braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice30.03m
-
2 Continental VikingContact 730.32m
-
3 Triangle SnowLink PL0130.37m
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R530.65m
-
5 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 330.9m
-
6 Michelin X Ice Snow30.96m
-
7 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico31.46m
5th of 7, +0.87m longer braking distance, 97.2% rating
Wet braking
Wet braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 337.55m
-
2 Michelin X Ice Snow38.4m
-
3 Continental VikingContact 739.31m
-
4 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice40.74m
-
5 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R540.88m
-
6 Triangle SnowLink PL0142.19m
-
7 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico43.34m
1st of 7, -0.85m shorter braking distance, 100% rating
Wet handling
Wet handling time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 341s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 741.4s
-
3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R542s
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow42.1s
-
5 Triangle SnowLink PL0142.4s
-
6 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico42.8s
-
7 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice43.9s
1st of 7, -0.4s faster, 100% rating
Straight aqua
Float speed in km/h
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 366km/h
-
2 Michelin X Ice Snow65km/h
-
3 Continental VikingContact 762.7km/h
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R561.4km/h
-
5 Triangle SnowLink PL0161km/h
-
6 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico60.5km/h
-
7 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice59.8km/h
1st of 7, +1km/h faster, 100% rating
Snow braking
Snow braking at 35km/h in meters
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 312.19m
-
2 Michelin X Ice Snow12.21m
-
3 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico12.27m
-
4 Continental VikingContact 712.34m
-
5 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R512.52m
-
6 Triangle SnowLink PL0112.52m
-
7 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice12.77m
1st of 7, -0.02m shorter braking distance, 100% rating
Snow handling
Snow handling time in seconds
-
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R575.5s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 775.7s
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 375.9s
-
4 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico76.4s
-
5 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice76.6s
-
6 Michelin X Ice Snow76.7s
-
7 Triangle SnowLink PL0179.9s
3rd of 7, +0.4s slower, 99.5% rating
Snow traction
Snow acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 34.44s
-
2 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico4.49s
-
3 Continental VikingContact 74.55s
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow4.57s
-
5 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R54.57s
-
6 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice4.59s
-
7 Triangle SnowLink PL014.68s
1st of 7, -0.05s faster, 100% rating
Ice braking
Ice braking at 25km/h in meters
-
1 Michelin X Ice Snow12.09m
-
2 Continental VikingContact 712.32m
-
3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R512.49m
-
4 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 313m
-
5 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico13.23m
-
6 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice13.3m
-
7 Triangle SnowLink PL0113.93m
4th of 7, +0.91m longer braking distance, 93% rating
Ice handling
Ice handling time in seconds
-
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R544s
-
2 Continental VikingContact 744.5s
-
3 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice44.9s
-
4 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico46s
-
5 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 346.7s
-
6 Michelin X Ice Snow47.1s
-
7 Triangle SnowLink PL0148.6s
5th of 7, +2.7s slower, 94.2% rating
Ice traction
Ice acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Michelin X Ice Snow7.32s
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R57.52s
-
3 Continental VikingContact 77.82s
-
4 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice8.05s
-
5 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 38.43s
-
6 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico8.97s
-
7 Triangle SnowLink PL019.17s
5th of 7, +1.11s slower, 86.8% rating
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption in l/100km
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 34.85km
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R54.9km
-
3 Continental VikingContact 75km
-
4 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico5.05km
-
5 Triangle SnowLink PL015.1km
-
6 Michelin X Ice Snow5.15km
-
7 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice5.2km
1st of 7, -0.05km better, 100% rating
Noise
External noise in dB
-
1 Bridgestone Blizzak Ice73.7dB
-
2 Pirelli Ice Zero Asimmetrico73.9dB
-
3 Continental VikingContact 774dB
-
4 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 374dB
-
5 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R574.3dB
-
6 Triangle SnowLink PL0174.3dB
-
7 Michelin X Ice Snow74.5dB
3rd of 7, +0.3dB louder, 99.6% rating
2023 Moottori (205/55 R16)
The tyre placed 1st overall.
Performance Summary
| Discipline | Place | Diff. | Perf. | Z-Sc. | Rat. | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking |
3rd of 4 | +0.58m | 98.1% | -0.09 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Wet braking |
🏆 1st of 4 | -2.57m | 100% | 1.56 | Exemplary | Significant advantage over competitors. |
Wet handling |
🏆 1st of 4 | -1s | 100% | 1.44 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Snow braking |
🏆 1st of 4 | -0.24m | 100% | 1.71 | Exemplary | Significant advantage over competitors. |
Snow handling |
2nd of 4 | +0.24s | 99.7% | 0.73 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Snow traction |
2nd of 4 | +0.05s | 98.9% | 0.44 | Average | Typical mid-level result, no clear strengths or weaknesses. |
Ice braking |
🏆 1st of 4 | -0.27m | 100% | 1.15 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Ice handling |
🏆 1st of 4 | -0.14s | 100% | 0.74 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Ice traction |
🏆 1st of 4 | -0.29s | 100% | 1.5 | Good | Reliable and consistent performance, above average. |
Detailed Results
Dry braking
Dry braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Pirelli Ice Zero FR30.67m
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R531.12m
-
3 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 331.25m
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow31.82m
3rd of 4, +0.58m longer braking distance, 98.1% rating
Wet braking
Wet braking at 80km/h in meters
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 338.49m
-
2 Pirelli Ice Zero FR41.06m
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow41.98m
-
4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R543.16m
1st of 4, -2.57m shorter braking distance, 100% rating
Wet handling
Wet handling time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 340.4s
-
2 Pirelli Ice Zero FR41.4s
-
3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R542.2s
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow42.8s
1st of 4, -1s faster, 100% rating
Snow braking
Snow braking in meters
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 311.28m
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R511.52m
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow11.56m
-
4 Pirelli Ice Zero FR11.57m
1st of 4, -0.24m shorter braking distance, 100% rating
Snow handling
Snow handling time in seconds
-
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R583.04s
-
2 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 383.28s
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow84.04s
-
4 Pirelli Ice Zero FR85.19s
2nd of 4, +0.24s slower, 99.7% rating
Snow traction
Snow acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Pirelli Ice Zero FR4.34s
-
2 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 34.39s
-
3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R54.45s
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow4.47s
2nd of 4, +0.05s slower, 98.9% rating
Ice braking
Ice braking at 50km/h in meters
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 314.75m
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R515.02m
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow15.3m
-
4 Pirelli Ice Zero FR15.92m
1st of 4, -0.27m shorter braking distance, 100% rating
Ice handling
Ice handling time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 369.76s
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R569.9s
-
3 Michelin X Ice Snow71.21s
-
4 Pirelli Ice Zero FR77.09s
1st of 4, -0.14s faster, 100% rating
Ice traction
Ice acceleration time in seconds
-
1 Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 36.39s
-
2 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R56.68s
-
3 Pirelli Ice Zero FR6.93s
-
4 Michelin X Ice Snow7.01s
1st of 4, -0.29s faster, 100% rating
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs. Competitors
Compared to similar competitors, Goodyear demonstrates exceptional performance across multiple key categories. It dominates in wet conditions and snow performance, securing top positions in braking, handling, and traction tests while leading in rolling resistance. The tire has excellent dry capabilities, is second place in braking, and maintains firm comfort with low noise levels. It delivers solid performance in ice conditions, placing in the top half for all ice-related tests.
Key Statistics
- Dry braking #6 of 10
- Wet braking #1 of 10
- Wet handling #1 of 10
- Lateral aqua #1 of 3
- Snow braking #1 of 10
- Snow handling #3 of 10
- Snow traction #2 of 10
- Ice braking #4 of 10
- Ice handling #3 of 10
- Ice traction #4 of 10
- Noise #2 of 6
- Rolling resistance #1 of 9
