Home » Winter

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro: Comprehensive Test Results & Performance Analysis

Reading 2 min Modified by
A premium winter performer with exceptional snow grip but slightly higher road noise. This in-depth review combines data from multiple independent tests with our expert analysis, including detailed performance metrics, direct competitor comparisons, and market position analysis to help you make an informed decision.

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro photo, test, review, ratings

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro is a High-Performance winter tire with an asymmetrical tread pattern designed for Passenger cars.

10.5

Average
place

7

Best
place

20

Worst
place

10

times
tested

2023-2025

test
years

Contents
  1. Key performance
  2. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro Tests
  3. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs. Competitors
  4. Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs. Market

Key performance

Overall rating: 90% (116 measurements from 10 independent tests)
ⓘ The overall rating is calculated as the arithmetic average of the average scores for each discipline, to eliminate bias towards disciplines with a large number of tests.

Dry Performance

  • Dry braking

    (3.5/5)
    Good
    Based on 10 tests|2 wins|Avg. pos. 5.3th|1-11th range|Rating: 96.7%
    Performance Chart
    • Good: 4 (40%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    • Average: 4 (40%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 1 (10%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    • Poor: 1 (10%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 10 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 58.4% of competitors per test
    • 🏆 Victories (1st place): 2 of 10
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 3 of 10
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 3 of 10
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 2 of 10
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 2 of 10
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:40.9 m (2023 Auto Bild SUV)
    • Worst result:45.6 m (2025 Auto Bild Sportscars)
    • Average result:43.6 m
    • Typical gap to leader:+1.15 – +1.95 m
    • Max gap to leader:+5.6 m (2025 Auto Bild Sportscars)

  • Dry handling

    (4/5)
    Good
    Based on 10 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 4.3th|2-8th range|Rating: 99.2%
    Performance Chart
    • Good: 7 (70%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    • Average: 3 (30%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 10 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 67.6% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 5 of 10
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 3 of 10
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 1 of 10
    • ✅ No last-place finishes

Wet Performance

  • Wet braking

    (2.5/5)
    Average
    Based on 10 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 8.6th|3-16th range|Rating: 92.3%
    Performance Chart
    • Good: 1 (10%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    • Average: 7 (70%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 2 (20%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    Detailed Test Results: 10 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 34.5% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 1 of 10
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 8 of 10
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 3 of 10
    • ✅ No last-place finishes
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:29.58 m (2023 Tyre Reviews)
    • Worst result:56.2 m (2023 Auto Bild)
    • Average result:42.8 m
    • Typical gap to leader:+1.6 – +5 m
    • Max gap to leader:+7.1 m (2023 Auto Bild)

  • Wet handling

    (3/5)
    Average
    Based on 10 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 6.8th|3-10th range|Rating: 97.6%
    Performance Chart
    • Average: 8 (80%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 2 (20%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    Detailed Test Results: 10 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 45.3% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 2 of 10
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 6 of 10
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 2 of 10
    • ✅ No last-place finishes

  • Wet lateral handling

    (4/5)
    Good
    Based on 5 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 5.4th|3-10th range|Rating: 98.1%
    Performance Chart
    • Good: 2 (40%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    • Average: 2 (40%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 1 (20%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    Detailed Test Results: 5 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 55% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 2 of 5
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 2 of 5
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 1 of 5
    • ✅ No last-place finishes

Aquaplaning resistance

  • Straight aqua

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 10 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 10.4th|3-20th range|Rating: 91.3%
    Performance Chart
    • Good: 1 (10%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    • Average: 1 (10%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 4 (40%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    • Poor: 4 (40%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 10 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 15.8% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 1 of 10
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 9 of 10
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 8 of 10
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 3 of 10
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:96.8 km/h (2023 Auto Bild Sports Cars)
    • Worst result:66.5 km/h (2024 AUTO Straßenverkehr)
    • Average result:77.9 km/h
    • Typical gap to leader:-11 – -5.4 km/h
    • Max gap to leader:-12.3 km/h (2025 Auto Bild Sportscars)

  • Lateral aqua

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 5 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 8.6th|7-11th range|Rating: 72.3%
    Performance Chart
    • Weak: 4 (80%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    • Poor: 1 (20%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 5 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 11.4% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 5 of 5
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 5 of 5
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 2 of 5

Snow Performance

  • Snow braking

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 10 tests|1 wins|Avg. pos. 10th|1-19th range|Rating: 92.5%
    Performance Chart
    • Good: 1 (10%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    • Average: 1 (10%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 6 (60%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    • Poor: 1 (10%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 10 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 21.3% of competitors per test
    • 🏆 Victories (1st place): 1 of 10
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 1 of 10
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 9 of 10
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 8 of 10
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 2 of 10
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:20.97 m (2023 Tyre Reviews)
    • Worst result:31.7 m (2023 AMS)
    • Average result:27.8 m
    • Typical gap to leader:+1.65 – +2.92 m
    • Max gap to leader:+3.6 m (2025 Auto Bild Sportscars)

  • Snow handling

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 10 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 10.7th|4-20th range|Rating: 94.2%
    Performance Chart
    • Average: 2 (20%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 2 (20%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    • Poor: 6 (60%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 10 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 14% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 9 of 10
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 8 of 10
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 5 of 10

  • Snow lateral handling

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 5 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 9.6th|2-20th range|Rating: 86.1%
    Performance Chart
    • Good: 1 (20%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    • Weak: 2 (40%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    • Poor: 2 (40%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 5 tests analyzed (2023)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 22.8% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 1 of 5
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 4 of 5
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 4 of 5
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 2 of 5

  • Snow traction

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 10 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 9.5th|3-20th range|Rating: 92.2%
    Performance Chart
    • Average: 5 (50%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 1 (10%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    • Poor: 3 (30%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 10 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 28.2% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 1 of 10
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 7 of 10
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 5 of 10
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 4 of 10

Secondary

  • Rolling resistance

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 10 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 9.8th|5-20th range|Rating: 85.3%
    Performance Chart
    • Average: 3 (30%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 6 (60%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    • Poor: 1 (10%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 10 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 22.1% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 9 of 10
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 7 of 10
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 2 of 10
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:7.8 kg/t (2025 Auto Bild Sportscars)
    • Worst result:9.8 kg/t (2023 Sport Auto)
    • Average result:8.7 kg/t
    • Typical gap to leader:+1.01 – +1.51 kg/t
    • Max gap to leader:+1.56 kg/t (2023 Auto Bild SUV)

  • Noise

    (2.5/5)
    Average
    Based on 9 tests|1 wins|Avg. pos. 6.7th|1-12th range|Rating: 98.3%
    Performance Chart
    • Exemplary: 1 (11%) i Outstanding result, significantly better than the test average.
    • Good: 1 (11%) i A solid performance, clearly above the average.
    • Average: 4 (44%) i A typical result, close to the test average.
    • Weak: 3 (33%) i The result is noticeably below the average.
    Detailed Test Results: 9 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 43.3% of competitors per test
    • 🏆 Victories (1st place): 1 of 9
    • ✅ Podium finishes (TOP-3): 2 of 9
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 7 of 9
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 2 of 9
    • ✅ No last-place finishes
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:65 dB (2025 Auto Bild)
    • Worst result:73.9 dB (2024 Auto Bild SUV)
    • Average result:71.8 dB
    • Typical gap to leader:+1 – +1.85 dB
    • Max gap to leader:+2 dB (2023 Auto Bild)

  • Wear resistance

    (2/5)
    Poor
    Based on 2 tests|0 wins|Avg. pos. 20th|20-20th range|Rating: 64.5%
    Performance Chart
    • Poor: 1 (50%) i A poor result, significantly worse than the test average.
    Detailed Test Results: 2 tests analyzed (2023-2025)
    Key statistics
    • Typically outperforms 0% of competitors per test
    • ➖ No first-place finishes
    • ➖ No TOP-3 finishes
    • ⚠️ Bottom-half finishes: 2 of 2
    • ⚠️ Worst-3 finishes: 2 of 2
    • ❌ Last-place finish: 2 of 2
    Results in numbers
    • Best result:33920km (2025 Auto Bild)
    • Worst result:29534km (2023 Auto Bild)
    • Average result:31727km
    • Max gap to leader:-19080km (2025 Auto Bild)

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro Tests

Independent magazines and organizations have tested the tire multiple times in various sizes. The detailed results from each test are below.

Year
Magazine
Size
Place
Score
2025
Auto Bild Sportscars
235/50 R19
9 (11)
2025
Auto Bild
225/40 R18
20 (20)
Satisfactory
2024
AUTO Straßenverkehr
235/55 R18
8 (10)
2024
Auto Bild SUV
245/45 R18
10 (12)
2023
Sport Auto
225/40 R18
9 (9)
2023
Auto Bild SUV
225/60 R18
7 (10)
2023
Auto Bild
225/45 R18
17 (20)
2023
Auto Bild Sports Cars
225/40 R18
8 (11)
Satisfactory
2023
AMS
255/45 R20
7 (7)
Satisfactory
2023
Tyre Reviews
225/45 R18
10 (11)

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs. Competitors

Compared to similar competitors, Falken demonstrates exceptional dry and wet performance, securing top positions in braking and handling and maintaining mid-pack rolling resistance. However, it struggles significantly with winter performance, ranking in the bottom third across all snow-related tests. It also shows below-average results in aquaplaning resistance and noise levels.

Key Statistics

  • ✅ Dry braking #3 of 11
  • 🏆 Dry handling #1 of 11
  • 🏆 Wet braking #1 of 11
  • 🏆 Wet handling #1 of 11
  • ⚠️ Straight aqua #10 of 11
  • ⚠️ Snow braking #10 of 11
  • ❌ Snow handling #11 of 11
  • ⚠️ Snow traction #9 of 11
  • ✅ Noise #5 of 11
  • ⚠️ Rolling resistance #8 of 11
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
Toyo Snowprox S954 0.4%
97.11%
0.4%
-0.18 m
2
Cooper Discoverer Winter 0.3%
97.01%
0.3%
-0.14 m
3
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
96.66%
—
—
4
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 0.5%
96.13%
0.5%
+0.21 m
5
Kleber Krisalp HP3 1.4%
95.23%
1.4%
+0.57 m
6
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 1.7%
94.94%
1.7%
+0.69 m
7
Semperit Speed Grip 5 2.2%
94.45%
2.2%
+0.89 m
8
GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport 2.3%
94.36%
2.3%
+0.92 m
9
Sava Eskimo HP2 3.7%
92.93%
3.7%
+1.50 m
10
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 4.0%
92.70%
4.0%
+1.59 m
11
Uniroyal WinterExpert 4.5%
92.19%
4.5%
+1.79 m
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
99.17%
—
—
2
Semperit Speed Grip 5 0.1%
99.05%
0.1%
-0.11 km/h
3
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 0.3%
98.89%
0.3%
-0.28 km/h
4
Toyo Snowprox S954 0.4%
98.79%
0.4%
-0.38 km/h
5
GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport 0.5%
98.70%
0.5%
-0.46 km/h
6
Uniroyal WinterExpert 0.8%
98.41%
0.8%
-0.75 km/h
7
Cooper Discoverer Winter 0.8%
98.37%
0.8%
-0.79 km/h
8
Sava Eskimo HP2 0.8%
98.32%
0.8%
-0.85 km/h
9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 1.1%
98.11%
1.1%
-1.06 km/h
10
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 1.2%
97.96%
1.2%
-1.20 km/h
11
Kleber Krisalp HP3 1.2%
97.96%
1.2%
-1.21 km/h
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
92.32%
—
—
2
Semperit Speed Grip 5 1.2%
91.15%
1.2%
+0.59 m
3
Uniroyal WinterExpert 1.5%
90.78%
1.5%
+0.77 m
4
Kleber Krisalp HP3 1.8%
90.49%
1.8%
+0.92 m
5
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 2.0%
90.34%
2.0%
+0.99 m
6
GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport 2.2%
90.11%
2.2%
+1.11 m
7
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 2.4%
89.96%
2.4%
+1.18 m
8
Cooper Discoverer Winter 3.4%
88.89%
3.4%
+1.72 m
9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 3.6%
88.75%
3.6%
+1.79 m
10
Toyo Snowprox S954 3.9%
88.43%
3.9%
+1.95 m
11
Sava Eskimo HP2 6.5%
85.84%
6.5%
+3.24 m
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
97.58%
—
—
2
GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport 0.0%
97.53%
0.0%
-0.04 km/h
3
Cooper Discoverer Winter 0.7%
96.86%
0.7%
-0.58 km/h
4
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 0.9%
96.67%
0.9%
-0.73 km/h
5
Kleber Krisalp HP3 1.2%
96.41%
1.2%
-0.94 km/h
6
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 1.3%
96.27%
1.3%
-1.04 km/h
7
Toyo Snowprox S954 1.5%
96.08%
1.5%
-1.20 km/h
8
Sava Eskimo HP2 1.6%
95.94%
1.6%
-1.31 km/h
9
Semperit Speed Grip 5 2.3%
95.28%
2.3%
-1.84 km/h
10
Uniroyal WinterExpert 2.3%
95.27%
2.3%
-1.85 km/h
11
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.9%
94.63%
2.9%
-2.36 km/h
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 6.3%
97.59%
6.3%
+5.04 km/h
2
Kleber Krisalp HP3 6.3%
97.57%
6.3%
+5.04 km/h
3
Semperit Speed Grip 5 6.2%
97.52%
6.2%
+4.99 km/h
4
Cooper Discoverer Winter 4.1%
95.42%
4.1%
+3.31 km/h
5
Toyo Snowprox S954 4.1%
95.41%
4.1%
+3.31 km/h
6
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 3.5%
94.76%
3.5%
+2.78 km/h
7
Uniroyal WinterExpert 2.7%
93.95%
2.7%
+2.13 km/h
8
GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport 1.5%
92.79%
1.5%
+1.21 km/h
9
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 0.8%
92.08%
0.8%
+0.64 km/h
10
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
91.28%
—
—
11
Sava Eskimo HP2 3.0%
88.28%
3.0%
-2.40 km/h
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 6.9%
99.36%
6.9%
—
2
Kleber Krisalp HP3 6.6%
99.07%
6.6%
—
3
Sava Eskimo HP2 5.4%
97.81%
5.4%
—
4
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 5.1%
97.58%
5.1%
—
5
Uniroyal WinterExpert 4.1%
96.57%
4.1%
—
6
Semperit Speed Grip 5 2.9%
95.36%
2.9%
—
7
Cooper Discoverer Winter 2.9%
95.34%
2.9%
—
8
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 1.9%
94.35%
1.9%
—
9
GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport 1.5%
93.98%
1.5%
—
10
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
92.46%
—
—
11
Toyo Snowprox S954 2.5%
89.99%
2.5%
—
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 4.9%
99.14%
4.9%
—
2
Kleber Krisalp HP3 4.5%
98.79%
4.5%
—
3
Sava Eskimo HP2 3.6%
97.81%
3.6%
—
4
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 3.4%
97.67%
3.4%
—
5
Uniroyal WinterExpert 3.0%
97.23%
3.0%
—
6
Semperit Speed Grip 5 2.7%
96.91%
2.7%
—
7
Cooper Discoverer Winter 2.5%
96.77%
2.5%
—
8
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 2.4%
96.63%
2.4%
—
9
GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport 1.3%
95.52%
1.3%
—
10
Toyo Snowprox S954 0.7%
94.94%
0.7%
—
11
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
94.24%
—
—
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 5.7%
97.95%
5.7%
—
2
Sava Eskimo HP2 5.6%
97.84%
5.6%
—
3
Kleber Krisalp HP3 5.4%
97.64%
5.4%
—
4
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 4.3%
96.55%
4.3%
—
5
Cooper Discoverer Winter 3.6%
95.89%
3.6%
—
6
Uniroyal WinterExpert 2.7%
94.99%
2.7%
—
7
Semperit Speed Grip 5 0.7%
92.95%
0.7%
—
8
GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport 0.1%
92.32%
0.1%
—
9
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
92.24%
—
—
10
Toyo Snowprox S954 0.0%
92.20%
0.0%
—
11
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 1.3%
90.93%
1.3%
—
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 1.4%
99.72%
1.4%
-1.04 dB
2
Cooper Discoverer Winter 1.4%
99.62%
1.4%
-0.97 dB
3
Kleber Krisalp HP3 0.6%
98.85%
0.6%
-0.42 dB
4
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 0.6%
98.84%
0.6%
-0.41 dB
5
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
98.27%
—
—
6
GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport 0.3%
98.00%
0.3%
+0.20 dB
7
Toyo Snowprox S954 0.3%
97.94%
0.3%
+0.24 dB
8
Uniroyal WinterExpert 0.5%
97.77%
0.5%
+0.36 dB
9
Semperit Speed Grip 5 0.8%
97.43%
0.8%
+0.60 dB
10
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.0%
96.29%
2.0%
+1.43 dB
11
Sava Eskimo HP2 3.9%
94.37%
3.9%
+2.81 dB
#
Model
Performance ⓘ
% ⓘ
Abs. ⓘ
1
Uniroyal WinterExpert 10.9%
96.14%
10.9%
-0.78 kg/t
2
Sava Eskimo HP2 7.9%
93.17%
7.9%
-0.57 kg/t
3
Semperit Speed Grip 5 6.9%
92.14%
6.9%
-0.50 kg/t
4
GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport 5.9%
91.13%
5.9%
-0.42 kg/t
5
Toyo Snowprox S954 5.1%
90.40%
5.1%
-0.37 kg/t
6
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 4.8%
90.06%
4.8%
-0.35 kg/t
7
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 1.6%
86.85%
1.6%
-0.12 kg/t
8
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
85.25%
—
—
9
Kleber Krisalp HP3 0.0%
85.24%
0.0%
+0.00 kg/t
10
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 3.5%
81.80%
3.5%
+0.25 kg/t
11
Cooper Discoverer Winter 3.7%
81.54%
3.7%
+0.27 kg/t

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs. Market

Comparison of key performance metrics with market medians.

The tire shows lower-than-median results in 8 testing areas while performing better in 6 areas. The most significant advantage is in wet braking (+1.87%). The main areas for improvement are wear resistance (-16.84%) and lateral aqua (-15.66%).
6 areas above the median
Dry braking (+0.48%)
Dry handling (+0.47%)
Wet braking (+1.87%)
Wet handling (+0.72%)
Wet lateral handling (+0.34%)
Noise (+0.23%)
8 areas below the median
Straight aqua (-3.28%)
Lateral aqua (-15.66%)
Snow braking (-3.91%)
Snow handling (-2.83%)
Snow lateral handling (-8.58%)
Snow traction (-3.67%)
Rolling resistance (-3.73%)
Wear resistance (-16.84%)
falken
alltyretests
AllTyreTests.com
Add a comment