Bridgestone Blizzak LM32

Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 photo, test, review

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 is a High Performance studless winter tyre with directional tread, designed for passenger cars.

2014 Auto Zeitung Bridgestone Blizzak LM 32 test

In 2014 experts of the German publication Auto Zeitung have tested the Bridgestone LM-32 at size 205/55 R16 and compared with 10 similar mid-range and premium winter tyres.

test Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 review
9th place in Wet braking. The braking distance was 3.2 meters longer, than the leader.
test Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 review
5th place in Wet handling. Bridgestone was 0.6 seconds slower, than the leader.
test Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 review
8th place in Wet lateral stability. Bridgestone was 0.47 seconds slower, than the leader.
test Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 review
5th place in Straight aqua. The float speed was 0,7 km/h lower, than the leader.
test Bridgestone Blizzak LM 32 review
2-3th place in Dry braking. The braking distance was 0.2 meters longer, than the leader.
test Bridgestone Blizzak LM 32 review
6-7th place in Dry handling. Bridgestone was 0.5 seconds slower, than the leader.
test Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 review
1-2nd place in Dry slalom. Bridgestone was 0.7km/h faster, than the next tire.
test Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 review
Last place and the worst result in Snow braking. The braking distance was 5.5 meters longer, than the leader.
test Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 review
Last place and the worst result in Snow handling. Bridgestone was 2.4 seconds slower, than the leader.
test Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 review
9-10th place in Snow traction.
test Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 review
3-11th place in Noise level.

Overall Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 review

According to the test results Bridgestone shared last place wih Korean Kumho.

Main conclusions:

  • Average wet performance.
  • Good straight aquaplanning resistance.
  • Good dry braking distance and handling time; one of the best slalom speed.
  • The worst snow performance: the longest braking distance, longest handling time and low traction.
  • Good noise level.

Similar tires from the test:

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars (8 votes, average: 3.75 out of 5)
Loading...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.