Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 photo, test, review, ratings

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is a Premium Touring studless tire with directional tread pattern, designed for Passenger cars.

The tire replaced the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 Evo.

2020 Auto Zeitung Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Test

In 2020 experts of the German magazine Auto Zeitung have tested the Bridgestone at size 205/55 R16 and compared to 13 similar budget, mid-range and premium winter tires.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2nd place in Dry braking. +0.7m braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2nd place in Subj. Dry handling. Subjective score – 9 points.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, reviews, ratings
1st place in Wet braking. -3.4m braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2nd place in Subj. Wet handling. Subjective score – 9 points.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2nd place in Straight aqua. -3km/h float speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, reviews, ratings
3-5th place in Snow braking. +0.3m braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, reviews, ratings
1st place in Subj. Snow handling. Subjective score – 10 points.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2nd place in Snow traction. -0.018 Newtons pulling force.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, reviews, ratings
4th place in Rolling resistance. +0.34kg/t rolling resistance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, reviews, ratings
3-6th place in Subj. Comfort. Subjective score – 9 points.
# Test Place Result Difference %
Dry braking at 100km/h 2 46.5m +0.7m 98.49%
Subj. Dry handling 2 9 points -1 point 90%
Wet braking at 100km/h 1 50.9m -3.4m 100%
Subj. Wet handling 2 9 points -1 point 90%
Straight aqua 2 82.8km/h -2.4km/h 97.1%
Snow braking at 50km/h 3-5 26m +0.3m 98.85%
Subj. Snow handling 1 10 points +1 point 100%
Snow traction 2 2.175 Newtons -0.18 Newtons 99.17%
Rolling resistance 4 8.40kg/t +0.34kg/t 95.95%
Subj. Comfort 3-6 9 points -1 point 90%

2020 Auto Bild Bridgestone LM005 Test

Test by the German magazine Auto Bild in 2020. The experts have tested the Bridgestone at size 245/45 R18 and compared to  19 similar UHP winter tires. Also they included into the test reference summer tire to compare results.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
1st place in Wet braking. -0.8m braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
4th place in Wet handling. -0.5km/h handling speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
3rd place in Wet lateral handling. +0.05sec lap time.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
11th place in Straight aqua. -3.7km/h float speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
10-11th place in Dry braking. +2.5m braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
5th place in Dry handling. -0.5km/h handling speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
2-3rd place in Snow braking. +0.2m braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
3rd place in Snow handling. -0.3km/h handling speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
2-3rd place in Snow slalom. -0.02m/s2 lateral acceleration.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
2nd place in Snow traction. -69 Newtons pulling force.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
8-9th place in Noise. +1.1dB external noise.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
2nd place in Rolling resistance. +0.4kg/t rolling resistance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
12th place in Wear resistance.
# Test Place Result Difference %
Dry braking at 100km/h 10-11 44.4 +2.5m 94.36%
Dry handling 6 110.1km/h -0.5km/h 99.54%
Wet braking at 100km/h 1 47.3m -0.8m 100%
Wet handling 4 73.9km/h -0.5km/h 99.32%
Wet lateral handling 3 12.12sec +0.05sec 99.58%
Straight aqua 1 87.6km/h -3.7km/h 95.78%
Snow braking at 50km/h 2-3 24.5m +0.2m 99.18%
Snow handling 3 61.2km/h -0.3km/h 99.5%
Snow slalom 2-3 3.38m/s2 -0.02m/2 99.4%
Snow traction 2 3029 Newtons 69 Newtons 97.7%
Rolling resistance 2 7.35kg/t +0.4kg/t 94.55%
Noise 8-9 64.1dB +1.1dB 98.28%
Wear resistance 11-12 40180 -7790km 80.61%

2020 AMS Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Test

Test by the German magazine Auto Motor und Sport in 2020. The experts have tested the tire at size 225/50 R17 and compared to 9 similar budget, mid-range and premium tires.

Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
1st place in Wet braking. -1.9m braking distance.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
1st place in Wet handling. +0.3km/h handling speed.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2nd place in Wet lateral handling. -0.2m/s2 lateral acceleration.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2-3rd place in Straight aqua. -0.3km/h float speed.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
3rd place in Lateral aqua. -0.28m/s2 lateral acceleration.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
7-8th place in Dry braking. +1.2m braking distance.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2nd place in Dry handling. -0.1km/h handling speed.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2nd place in Snow braking. +0.1m braking distance.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2nd place in Snow handling. -1.3km/h handling speed.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
1st place in Snow lateral handling. +0.03m/s2 lateral acceleration.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2-3rd place in Snow traction. -0.7m/s2 max acceleration.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
2nd place in Rolling resistance. +0.2kg/t rolling resistance.
Bridgestone LM005 test, reviews, ratings
3-6th place in Noise. +0.8dB external noise.
# Test Place Result Difference %
Dry braking at 100km/h 7-8 43.8m +1.2m 97.26%
Dry handling 2 115.3km/h -0.1km/h 99.91%
Wet braking at 100km/h 1 31.7m -1.9m 100%
Wet handling 1 74.1km/h +0.3km/h 100%
Wet lateral handling 2 7.52m/s2 -0.2m/s2 97.35%
Straight aqua 2-3 94.7km/h -0.3km/h 99.7%
Lateral aqua 3 2.44m/s2 -0.28m/s2 88.52%
Snow braking at 50km/h 2 27.3m +0.1m 99.63%
Snow handling 2 46.4km/h -1.3km/h 97.2%
Snow lateral handling 1 3.43m/s2 +0.03m/2 100%
Snow traction 2-3 1.74m/s2 -0.7m/s2 95.9%
Rolling resistance 2 7.9kg/t +0.2kg/t 97.47%
Noise 3-6 71.7dB +0.8dB 99.88%

2019 Auto Bild Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Test

Test by the German publication Auto Bild in 2019. The experts have tested the tire at size 225/45 R17 and compared to 10 similar budget, mid-range and premium winter tires.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
4-5th place in Dry braking. +0.2m braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
2nd place in Dry handling. -0.3km/h handling speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
1st place in Wet braking. -1.2m braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
2nd place in Wet handling. -0.4km/h handling speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
5th place in Straight aqua. -3.8km/h float speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
10-12th place in Snow braking. +0.6m braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
16th place in Snow handling. -2km/h handling speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
7th place in Rolling resistance. +0.52kg/t rolling resistance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
6th place in Noise. +1.3dB external noise.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test, review, ratings
5th place in Wear resistance.
# Test Place Result Difference %
Dry braking 4-5 44.5m +0.2m 99.55%
Dry handling 2 82.6km/h -0.3km/h 99.64%
Wet braking at 100km/h 1 29.2m -1.2m 100%
Wet handling 2 74.3km/h -0.4km/h 99.46%
Straight aqua 5 74.2km/h -3.8km/h 94.88%
Snow braking 10-12 24.6m +0.6m 97.56%
Snow handling 16 76.4km/h -2km/h 97.38%
Rolling resistance 7 7.95kg/t +0.52kg/t 93.46%
Noise 6 70dB +1.3dB 98.14%
Wear resistance 5 42230km -9020km 78.64%

2019 Auto Motor und Sport Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Test

In 2019 experts of the German publication AMS have tested the Bridgestone LM-005 at size 215/55 R17 and compared to 10similar budget, medium and premium winter tires.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
1st place in Wet braking. -1.1m braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
3rd place in Wet lateral handling. -0.43m/s2 lateral acceleration.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
3rd place in Wet handling. -0.4km/h average handling speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
6th place in Straight aqua. -7.6km/h float speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
6th place in Lateral aqua. -0.26m/s2 lateral acceleration.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
4-6th place in Dry braking. +0.5m braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
7-8th place in Dry handling. -1.2km/h average handling speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
1st place in Snow braking. -0.4m snow braking distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
3rd place in Snow lateral handling. -0.03m/s2 lateral acceleration.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
4th place in Snow traction. -0.05m/s2 max acceleration.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
7th place in Snow handling. -1.4km/h average handling speed.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
2nd place in Rolling resistance. +0.2kg/t rolling resistance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 test and review
7th place in Noise. +0.9dB external noise.
# Test Place Result Difference %
Dry braking 4-6 44.6m +0.5m 99.88%
Dry handling 7-8 114.9km/h -1.2km/h 98.95%
Wet braking at 80km/h 1 31.2m -1.1m 100%
Wet handling 3 72.9km/h -0.4km/h 99.45%
Wet lateral handling 3 6.88m/s2 -0.43m/s2 93.75%
Straight aqua 6 75.5km/h -7.6km/h 89.93%
Lateral aqua 6 3.16m/s2 -0.26m/s2 91.77%
Snow braking 1 25.6m -0.4m 100%
Snow handling 7 48km/h -1.4km/h 97.08%
Snow lateral handling 3 3.87m/s2 -0.03m/s2 99.22%
Snow traction 4 2.41m/s2 -0.05m/s2 97.88%
Rolling resistance 2 7.6kg/t +0.2kg/t 97.37%
Noise 7 70.2dB +0.9dB 98.72%

Overall Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Reviews

# Test 2020 Auto Zeitung 2020 Auto Bild 2020 AMS 2019 Auto Bild 2019 AMS Overall
Dry braking 98.49% 94.36% 97.26% 99.55% 99.88% 97.91%
Dry handling 90% 99.54% 99.91% 99.64% 98.95% 97.61%
Wet braking 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Wet handling 90% 99.32% 100% 99.46% 99.45% 97.65%
Wet lateral handling 99.58% 97.35% 93.75 96.89
Straight aqua 97.1% 95.78% 99.7% 99.7% 89.93% 96.44%
Lateral aqua 88.52% 91.77% 90.15%
Snow braking 98.85% 99.18% 99.63% 97.56% 100% 99.04%
Snow handling 100% 99.5% 97.2% 97.38% 97.08% 98.23%
Snow slalom 99.4% 100% 99.22% 99.54%
Snow traction 99.17% 97.7% 95.9% 97.88% 97.66%
Rolling resistance 95.95% 95.55% 97.47% 93.46% 97.37% 95.96%
Noise 95.95% 98.28% 99.88% 98.14% 98.72% 98.19%
Comfort 90% 90%
Wear resistance 80.61% 78.64% 79.63%

1. 2020 Auto Zeitung (205/55 R16) – 1st place.

Main conclusions:

  • Good dry performance.
  • The best results on the wet.
  • High straight aquaplaning resistance.
  • Short snow braking distance, high traction and the best handling.
  • Low rolling resistance.
  • High comfort.

2. 2020 Auto Bild (245/45 R18) – 2nd place and an expert score “Exemplary”.

Main conclusions:

  • The shortest wet braking distance and good handling.
  • Average straight aquaplaning resistance.
  • Good results on the dry.
  • Great snow performance.
  • Average noise.
  • Low rolling resistance.
  • Average wear resistance.

3. 2020 AMS (225/50 R17) – 1st place.

Main conclusions:

  • The shortest wet braking distance and the best handling speed.
  • High straight and lateral aquaplaning resistance.
  • Good results on the dry.
  • Short snow braking distance and good handling.
  • Low rolling resistance.
  • Average noise.

4. 2019 Auto Bild (225/45 R17) – 5th place and an expert score “Exemplary”.

Main conclusions:

  • Short dry braking distance and good handling speed.
  • The shortest wet braking distance and good handling speed.
  • High aquaplaning resistance.
  • Short snow braking distance and relatively low handling speed.
  • Good rolling resistance.
  • Low noise.
  • Good wear resistance.

5. 2019 AMS (215/55 R17) – 2nd place and an expert score “Very good”.

Main conclusions:

  • The shortest wet braking distance and good handling.
  • Average straight and lateral aquaplaning resistance.
  • Good dry performance.
  • The best snow braking distance, good traction and handling.
  • Low rolling resistance and noise.

Similar tires from the test:

alltyretests
Rate author
AllTyreTests.com
Add a comment