Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is a Premium Touring studless tire with directional tread pattern, designed for Passenger cars.
The tire replaced the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 Evo.
Key performance
2020 Auto Zeitung Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Test
In 2020 experts of the German magazine Auto Zeitung have tested the Bridgestone at size 205/55 R16 and compared to 13 similar budget, mid-range and premium winter tires.










# | Test | Place | Result | Difference | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking at 100km/h | 2 | 46.5m | +0.7m | 98.49% | |
Subj. Dry handling | 2 | 9 points | -1 point | 90% | |
Wet braking at 100km/h | 1 | 50.9m | -3.4m | 100% | |
Subj. Wet handling | 2 | 9 points | -1 point | 90% | |
Straight aqua | 2 | 82.8km/h | -2.4km/h | 97.1% | |
Snow braking at 50km/h | 3-5 | 26m | +0.3m | 98.85% | |
Subj. Snow handling | 1 | 10 points | +1 point | 100% | |
Snow traction | 2 | 2.175 Newtons | -0.18 Newtons | 99.17% | |
Rolling resistance | 4 | 8.40kg/t | +0.34kg/t | 95.95% | |
Subj. Comfort | 3-6 | 9 points | -1 point | 90% |
2020 Auto Bild Bridgestone LM005 Test
Test by the German magazine Auto Bild in 2020. The experts have tested the Bridgestone at size 245/45 R18 and compared to 19 similar UHP winter tires. Also they included into the test reference summer tire to compare results.













# | Test | Place | Result | Difference | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking at 100km/h | 10-11 | 44.4 | +2.5m | 94.36% | |
Dry handling | 6 | 110.1km/h | -0.5km/h | 99.54% | |
Wet braking at 100km/h | 1 | 47.3m | -0.8m | 100% | |
Wet handling | 4 | 73.9km/h | -0.5km/h | 99.32% | |
Wet lateral handling | 3 | 12.12sec | +0.05sec | 99.58% | |
Straight aqua | 1 | 87.6km/h | -3.7km/h | 95.78% | |
Snow braking at 50km/h | 2-3 | 24.5m | +0.2m | 99.18% | |
Snow handling | 3 | 61.2km/h | -0.3km/h | 99.5% | |
Snow slalom | 2-3 | 3.38m/s2 | -0.02m/2 | 99.4% | |
Snow traction | 2 | 3029 Newtons | 69 Newtons | 97.7% | |
Rolling resistance | 2 | 7.35kg/t | +0.4kg/t | 94.55% | |
Noise | 8-9 | 64.1dB | +1.1dB | 98.28% | |
Wear resistance | 11-12 | 40180 | -7790km | 80.61% |
2020 AMS Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Test
Test by the German magazine Auto Motor und Sport in 2020. The experts have tested the tire at size 225/50 R17 and compared to 9 similar budget, mid-range and premium tires.













# | Test | Place | Result | Difference | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking at 100km/h | 7-8 | 43.8m | +1.2m | 97.26% | |
Dry handling | 2 | 115.3km/h | -0.1km/h | 99.91% | |
Wet braking at 100km/h | 1 | 31.7m | -1.9m | 100% | |
Wet handling | 1 | 74.1km/h | +0.3km/h | 100% | |
Wet lateral handling | 2 | 7.52m/s2 | -0.2m/s2 | 97.35% | |
Straight aqua | 2-3 | 94.7km/h | -0.3km/h | 99.7% | |
Lateral aqua | 3 | 2.44m/s2 | -0.28m/s2 | 88.52% | |
Snow braking at 50km/h | 2 | 27.3m | +0.1m | 99.63% | |
Snow handling | 2 | 46.4km/h | -1.3km/h | 97.2% | |
Snow lateral handling | 1 | 3.43m/s2 | +0.03m/2 | 100% | |
Snow traction | 2-3 | 1.74m/s2 | -0.7m/s2 | 95.9% | |
Rolling resistance | 2 | 7.9kg/t | +0.2kg/t | 97.47% | |
Noise | 3-6 | 71.7dB | +0.8dB | 99.88% |
2019 Auto Bild Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Test
Test by the German publication Auto Bild in 2019. The experts have tested the tire at size 225/45 R17 and compared to 10 similar budget, mid-range and premium winter tires.










# | Test | Place | Result | Difference | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking | 4-5 | 44.5m | +0.2m | 99.55% | |
Dry handling | 2 | 82.6km/h | -0.3km/h | 99.64% | |
Wet braking at 100km/h | 1 | 29.2m | -1.2m | 100% | |
Wet handling | 2 | 74.3km/h | -0.4km/h | 99.46% | |
Straight aqua | 5 | 74.2km/h | -3.8km/h | 94.88% | |
Snow braking | 10-12 | 24.6m | +0.6m | 97.56% | |
Snow handling | 16 | 76.4km/h | -2km/h | 97.38% | |
Rolling resistance | 7 | 7.95kg/t | +0.52kg/t | 93.46% | |
Noise | 6 | 70dB | +1.3dB | 98.14% | |
Wear resistance | 5 | 42230km | -9020km | 78.64% |
2019 Auto Motor und Sport Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Test
In 2019 experts of the German publication AMS have tested the Bridgestone LM-005 at size 215/55 R17 and compared to 10similar budget, medium and premium winter tires.













# | Test | Place | Result | Difference | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking | 4-6 | 44.6m | +0.5m | 99.88% | |
Dry handling | 7-8 | 114.9km/h | -1.2km/h | 98.95% | |
Wet braking at 80km/h | 1 | 31.2m | -1.1m | 100% | |
Wet handling | 3 | 72.9km/h | -0.4km/h | 99.45% | |
Wet lateral handling | 3 | 6.88m/s2 | -0.43m/s2 | 93.75% | |
Straight aqua | 6 | 75.5km/h | -7.6km/h | 89.93% | |
Lateral aqua | 6 | 3.16m/s2 | -0.26m/s2 | 91.77% | |
Snow braking | 1 | 25.6m | -0.4m | 100% | |
Snow handling | 7 | 48km/h | -1.4km/h | 97.08% | |
Snow lateral handling | 3 | 3.87m/s2 | -0.03m/s2 | 99.22% | |
Snow traction | 4 | 2.41m/s2 | -0.05m/s2 | 97.88% | |
Rolling resistance | 2 | 7.6kg/t | +0.2kg/t | 97.37% | |
Noise | 7 | 70.2dB | +0.9dB | 98.72% |
Overall Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Reviews
# | Test | 2020 Auto Zeitung | 2020 Auto Bild | 2020 AMS | 2019 Auto Bild | 2019 AMS | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry braking | 98.49% | 94.36% | 97.26% | 99.55% | 99.88% | 97.91% | |
Dry handling | 90% | 99.54% | 99.91% | 99.64% | 98.95% | 97.61% | |
Wet braking | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
Wet handling | 90% | 99.32% | 100% | 99.46% | 99.45% | 97.65% | |
Wet lateral handling | – | 99.58% | 97.35% | – | 93.75 | 96.89 | |
Straight aqua | 97.1% | 95.78% | 99.7% | 99.7% | 89.93% | 96.44% | |
Lateral aqua | – | – | 88.52% | – | 91.77% | 90.15% | |
Snow braking | 98.85% | 99.18% | 99.63% | 97.56% | 100% | 99.04% | |
Snow handling | 100% | 99.5% | 97.2% | 97.38% | 97.08% | 98.23% | |
Snow slalom | – | 99.4% | 100% | – | 99.22% | 99.54% | |
Snow traction | 99.17% | 97.7% | 95.9% | – | 97.88% | 97.66% | |
Rolling resistance | 95.95% | 95.55% | 97.47% | 93.46% | 97.37% | 95.96% | |
Noise | 95.95% | 98.28% | 99.88% | 98.14% | 98.72% | 98.19% | |
Comfort | 90% | – | – | – | – | 90% | |
Wear resistance | – | 80.61% | – | 78.64% | – | 79.63% |
1. 2020 Auto Zeitung (205/55 R16) – 1st place.
Main conclusions:
- Good dry performance.
- The best results on the wet.
- High straight aquaplaning resistance.
- Short snow braking distance, high traction and the best handling.
- Low rolling resistance.
- High comfort.
2. 2020 Auto Bild (245/45 R18) – 2nd place and an expert score “Exemplary”.
Main conclusions:
- The shortest wet braking distance and good handling.
- Average straight aquaplaning resistance.
- Good results on the dry.
- Great snow performance.
- Average noise.
- Low rolling resistance.
- Average wear resistance.
3. 2020 AMS (225/50 R17) – 1st place.
Main conclusions:
- The shortest wet braking distance and the best handling speed.
- High straight and lateral aquaplaning resistance.
- Good results on the dry.
- Short snow braking distance and good handling.
- Low rolling resistance.
- Average noise.
4. 2019 Auto Bild (225/45 R17) – 5th place and an expert score “Exemplary”.
Main conclusions:
- Short dry braking distance and good handling speed.
- The shortest wet braking distance and good handling speed.
- High aquaplaning resistance.
- Short snow braking distance and relatively low handling speed.
- Good rolling resistance.
- Low noise.
- Good wear resistance.
5. 2019 AMS (215/55 R17) – 2nd place and an expert score “Very good”.
Main conclusions:
- The shortest wet braking distance and good handling.
- Average straight and lateral aquaplaning resistance.
- Good dry performance.
- The best snow braking distance, good traction and handling.
- Low rolling resistance and noise.
Similar tires from the test: