2025 Best All Season Tires Rating

This is the most comprehensive and data-driven ranking of modern all-season tires available in 2025.

It includes 29 nearly all the popular models on the market, ranging from budget-friendly options to premium selections. Every tire featured has the official 3PMSF (Three Peak Mountain Snowflake) certification, ensuring they meet winter performance standards.

All ratings are based exclusively on real-world results from independent European tire tests — no simulations, no subjective user reviews, and no brand influence. You gain access to truly objective data. You can learn more about our data sources & measurement methods. 

Interactive Performance Comparison Tool

You can easily sort the interactive table by the criteria that matter most to you: wet grip, snow braking, fuel efficiency, noise, and more. Each tire profile includes detailed statistics, such as the number of test appearances, best and worst placements, average scores, podium finishes, and overall ranking. This powerful tool is designed to help you find the perfect all-season tire, based on undisputed facts, not guesswork.

Top-10 All-Season Tires by AllTyreTests.com

Selecting the best all-season tires can be a challenging task. The market is overflowing with dozens of models, each promising to be ideal for any conditions. To bring clarity and help you make an informed decision, we at AllTyreTests have created this definitive, data-driven ranking.

This list is not just our subjective opinion. It is the result of an in-depth analysis of data from our database, which includes independent tests from the most authoritative European publications. Each tire in this TOP-10 was selected based on strict and objective criteria:

• High average performance: Only those models that consistently rank high in tests and have a high average score across all disciplines made it into the ranking.
• No critical flaws: We did not consider tires rated “Poor” in any of the key safety areas.
• Balance and unique “character”: The final list includes not only absolute leaders, but also models with a unique set of advantages, representing different “philosophies”.

1

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

The AllSeason Contact 2 is the clear leader in the modern all-season tire segment, effectively blurring the line between specialized summer and winter tires. Its exceptionally balanced performance, demonstrated by outstanding test results (averaging 1.9 out of 8 tests and never finishing below 3rd place), makes it the top choice for year-round driving.

✅Pros

• Outstanding performance on wet and snowy roads, receiving an “Exemplary” rating for handling on both wet asphalt (6 wins!) and snow, ensuring the highest safety standards in unpredictable and challenging weather conditions.
• Exceptional economy and durability, with top ratings for wear resistance, rolling resistance, and noise level, make this tire one of the most profitable and comfortable options for year-round use.
• Reliable performance on dry surfaces. Although it is an all-season tire, it consistently achieves safe and good results on dry asphalt, including a victory in handling tests.

⚠️ Compromises

• While it performs adequately in snow, its traction is not among the best in its class, with an “average” rating.
• Additionally, its lateral aquaplaning resistance is also considered average, yet remains at a safe level.

❌Cons

• No obvious.

---

For drivers in regions with moderate “European” winters who want to use a single set of tires year-round without compromising safety. This option is ideal for most modern cars and crossovers.

2

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

The Turanza All Season 6 is a strong contender among leading brands in the all-season tire segment, known for its remarkable “summer” performance since its release in 2023. It provides excellent grip and stability on both dry and, particularly, wet roads, closely matching the performance of the best summer tires. Furthermore, it exhibits impressive reliability on snow, making it one of the top choices available on the market.

✅Pros

• Its standout feature is exceptional wet performance. With “benchmark” braking, evidenced by seven wins in eleven tests, and remarkable handling, it provides an incredible level of control comparable to that of summer tires.
• Exceptional performance on dry surfaces. “Exemplary” ratings in braking and handling provide safety during dynamic summer driving.
• While designed for summer use, the tire provides excellent handling and snow traction, which are vital for winter conditions.

⚠️ Compromises

• Snow braking, fuel consumption, and noise levels are average; they are acceptable but not outstanding.

❌Cons

• None.

---

For drivers seeking all-season tires with summer-like performance, opt for ones that offer sharp handling and excellent wet grip. These tires are ideal for year-round asphalt driving, ensuring safety during occasional snowfall.

3

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

The Vector Gen-3 excels in providing an ideal balance of safety and performance for all weather conditions: summer, rain, and snow. Its standout feature is the impressive combination of these attributes, along with exceptional comfort and durability. This elite status is reinforced by strong test results, achieving an average ranking of 3.2 out of 19 tests.

✅Pros

• An “Exemplary” rating in wear resistance makes it an ideal choice for those who value high mileage.
• The tire exhibits excellent handling on both dry and wet asphalt, giving a sensation of complete control.
• Excellent performance on snow. Consistent “good” ratings in all snow disciplines ensure a high level of safety during winter.

⚠️ Compromises

• Both dry braking performance and noise levels are average for this model. While these aspects are not outstanding, they remain safe and acceptable.

❌Cons

• None.

---

For drivers seeking a balanced, comfortable, and durable premium all-season tire, this is the ideal choice for family sedans and crossovers. It provides year-round performance without compromising quality.

4

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

The Kinergy 4S2 is a high-performance all-season tire that offers excellent grip in various conditions, including wet and snowy roads, at a more affordable price. With an impressive average score of 4.0 from 16 tests, it stands out as one of the best options available on the market.

✅Pros

• Outstanding performance in wet and snowy conditions. It has an “exemplary” rating for wet braking and snow handling, ensuring the highest levels of safety and control in challenging winter and autumn weather.
• The performance in dry conditions is very strong, consistently receiving “good” ratings for both braking and handling.
• A “Good” rating for noise and one of the best overall ride comfort ratings.

⚠️ Compromises

• Fuel economy and wear resistance are moderate compromises, making it less sustainable in the long run compared to industry leaders.

❌Cons

• None.

---

For drivers who are looking for an all-season tire with a sporty character and do not want to compromise on handling, especially on snow and wet roads. The ideal choice if driving pleasure is as important to you as all-season practicality.

5

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

The latest development from Pirelli sets the standard for all-season tire performance in summer and autumn conditions. The Cinturato SF3 offers almost uncompromising grip and safety on dry and wet asphalt, but this outstanding level of performance comes at the cost of very low wear resistance. Its dominant results in tests (averaging 2.8) make it the choice for those seeking maximum grip all year round.

✅Pros

• Outstanding performance on both dry and wet asphalt. It received “Exemplary” ratings in nearly all summer disciplines, achieving dominant victories in braking (4 out of 5 tests) and aquaplaning protection (4 out of 5 tests).
• Despite its “summer” characteristics, the tire shows “good” and “exemplary” ratings in handling and grip on snow, ensuring a sufficient level of safety for moderate winters.
• Excellent fuel efficiency is a bonus alongside its high grip.

⚠️ Compromises

• The snow braking distance and noise level of the tire are adequate but not exceptional.

❌Cons

• The model has a major drawback: it exhibits poor wear resistance.

---

For drivers who demand performance on par with the best summer models from an all-season tire and are not willing to compromise on grip. An ideal choice if cost of ownership and durability are not your top priorities.

6

Vredestein Quatrac

The Vredestein Quatrac is a standout in the all-season tire category, known for its sporty handling, particularly in wet conditions. It is an ideal choice for those who value both versatility and year-round driving enjoyment. With impressive test results—ranking an average of 2.5 out of 8 tests—it stands out as one of the most appealing and effective options available on the market.

✅Pros

• Outstanding wet handling sets a new standard with 6 wins in 8 tests. It offers remarkable precision, control, and confidence in rainy conditions.
• Exceptional dry performance, with “Exemplary” ratings in braking and handling, ensures sporty behavior and a high level of safety during the summer.
• The tire has a very balanced profile, receiving “Good” or “Exemplary” ratings in nearly all categories, including aquaplaning protection, snow handling, wear resistance, and fuel economy.

⚠️ Compromises

• Average braking on snow is the only noticeable compromise of the model.

❌Cons

• None.

---

For drivers who value sharp reactions and driving pleasure, and are looking for an all-season tire with a sporty character. The ideal choice for those who want maximum control and feedback from the car, especially in rainy weather.

7

Michelin CrossClimate 2

The CrossClimate 2 is perhaps the most renowned all-season tire globally and is considered a true “winter specialist.” It delivers exceptional performance on snow, comparable to many winter tires. However, its strong emphasis on snow and dry surfaces results in notable compromises in wet handling. As a result, despite achieving a high average test ranking (2.9), we have placed it at the bottom of our rating.

✅Pros

• Outstanding performance on snow makes this an absolute leader in its class. It has received “exemplary” ratings and boasts numerous victories across all four snow disciplines. If you reside in a region with genuine, snowy winters, this is the ideal choice.
• Exceptional dry braking performance and excellent fuel efficiency: 14 victories in 18 dry braking tests and an “exemplary” rating for rolling resistance make it perfect for 9 months of “non-winter” use.
• Despite some handling issues, the wet braking distance and resistance to direct aquaplaning are rated as high, or “good.”

⚠️ Compromises

• While it exhibits good braking performance, its wet handling is only average, falling short of that of its top competitors.

❌Cons

• The primary and significant drawback is the weak lateral stability on wet roads.

---

This tire is ideal for drivers in areas with consistent winter snow cover who prioritize safety and need a year-round option. However, it’s not recommended for regions with mostly rainy, snow-free winters, where better wet handling tires are available.

8

Nokian SeasonProof

The Nokian SeasonProof tire is ideal for those seeking maximum safety and performance in snowy conditions, without the inconvenience of changing tires twice a year. It excels as a winter tire while maintaining the versatility of an all-season option. Its outstanding performance in winter tests is impressive, although it may not perform as well in summer conditions.

✅Pros

• Outstanding snow performance with top ratings. It excels in all four snow disciplines: braking, handling, lateral grip, and traction.
• Superior comfort and durability. It has an “Exemplary” rating for noise, overall comfort, and wear resistance, making it perfect for everyday use.
• The vehicle offers good fuel economy, and the “Good” rating for rolling resistance adds an extra benefit.

⚠️ Compromises

• Average wet performance in all disciplines, including braking and aquaplaning, is at a safe but average level, which is not outstanding.
• The braking distance on dry pavement is acceptable, though not as good as the best.

❌Cons

• Poor dry handling is the main weakness.

---

For drivers in snowy regions who prioritize safety, this is the ideal all-season tire. It’s perfect for Scandinavia, the Alps, and northern countries, where “summer” means just no snow.

9

Falken EuroAll Season AS210

The Falken tire is a dependable “workhorse” designed for drivers who prioritize maximum durability and confident performance on asphalt throughout the year. While it may not set speed records, it excels in balance and is recognized for its outstanding wear resistance in its class. With an average rating of 6.6 out of 12 tests, it stands out as a pragmatic choice in the mid-price segment.

✅Pros

• Exceptional wear resistance is the primary advantage of this model. The “Exemplary” rating indicates that this tire will outlast many competitors, making it a wise investment.
• Consistent performance on both dry and wet asphalt ensures high safety. It receives “good” ratings in braking, handling, and aquaplaning.

⚠️ Compromises

• The tire’s braking and snow traction are adequate for occasional snowfalls, but they are not exceptional.g.

❌Cons

• Poor fuel economy and noise are the trade-offs for durability and affordability.

---

For high-mileage drivers looking for the most durable and reliable tire for mostly on-pavement use, and willing to sacrifice acoustic comfort and fuel economy.

10

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

The Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 is a dependable mid-range tire that delivers solid performance across all key areas, with no significant drawbacks. It is an excellent choice for drivers seeking safe handling on wet and snowy roads, as well as good durability. Its consistent performance in six tests reinforces its reputation as a reliable workhorse.

✅Pros

• Excellent wet performance, with “Good” ratings in braking and handling, along with “Exemplary” ratings in lateral stability on wet roads, ensures a high level of safety in rainy conditions.
• Reliable performance in snow yields consistent “Good” ratings across various snow disciplines, making it a safe choice for areas with moderate winter weather conditions.
• Good durability and economy. Ratings for wear resistance and rolling resistance are “Good,” indicating a favorable cost of ownership.

⚠️ Compromises

• Dry performance is average and predictable, lacking the sportiness typical of this class of tire.

❌Cons

• High Noise is the main drawback of the model, and acoustic comfort is sacrificed for other characteristics.

---

For drivers seeking a reliable, durable, and safe all-season tire from a well-known brand, this is an excellent choice for daily use in regions with variable weather conditions, though it may produce increased noise levels.

Buyer’s Guide: How Tire Characteristics Differ — and Does Price Really Matter?

This table helps you understand how much tire performance can vary — from the best to the worst — and whether price actually influences the results. You’ll see which characteristics show the biggest differences, where premium tires truly stand out, and where budget options can be surprisingly competitive.

Use this data to make an informed decision — and avoid overpaying for minimal gains.

Market Analysis, Key Insights & Conclusions

Our extensive analysis of data collected from numerous independent tire tests has enabled us to go beyond simple rankings. We’ve conducted in-depth research to uncover hidden patterns across price segments, assess the accurate scale of performance differences between the best and worst tires, and understand what constitutes the ‘core of the market’ and what to expect from most tires. These insights will help you see the full picture and make a truly informed choice.

Dry Braking: Significant Gaps and a Strong Price Correlation

Dry braking for all-season tires reveals that price generally correlates with performance. Premium brands securely hold the top spots while budget models largely populate the bottom, confirming the hypothesis. However, exceptions exist: a budget-friendly Nexen outperforms some premium competitors, while a sub-premium Yokohama disappoints with a surprisingly poor result, proving that outliers can defy the trend.

1. The dry braking performance of all-season tires varies significantly, meaning the right choice can have a significant impact on stopping distance.
2. The stopping distance difference between the best and worst tires can be as much as 7.6 meters (16% variance from a reference braking distance of 40 meters at 100 km/h), reflecting the most extreme cases.
3. On average, the performance gap between a typical tire from the top 25% and one from the bottom 25% is 4.3 meters (a 9% variance).
4. The majority of tires in the “core market,” excluding the leaders and outsiders, demonstrate relatively consistent performance. The braking distance among these models varies by only 2.4 meters (a 5.3% margin), suggesting that most mid-tier products perform at a similar level.
5. The group of leaders is primarily composed of premium tires, holding the top three positions, along with strong representatives from the middle class. This indirectly supports the hypothesis of price correlation.
6. The group of outsiders mainly consists of budget models, but also includes the sub-premium Yokohama and some mid-range models.
7. Hidden gem: Nexen is located on the border of two quartiles, offering a budget model that outperforms many premium models.
8. The biggest disappointment was Yokohama, a sub-premium brand, being placed in the worst cluster.
9. Although there are decent options among budget models, in most cases, the hypothesis that “a more expensive tire has a shorter braking distance, and budget tires brake worse” is generally confirmed.

Dry Handling: A Field of High Consistency

For all-season tires, dry handling is a discipline that consistently delivers impressively high performance across the board. While premium tires tend to lead, the actual performance gap between them and even budget models is often so small it’s unnoticeable for the average driver. Price is not a strong indicator of performance here, as proven by a mid-range Falken outperforming premium models and a premium Nokian falling among the outsiders.

1. Most all-season tires provide very high and comparable handling on dry surfaces, with virtually no significant “failures” in this characteristic. The range between the best and the worst is about 3.5%.
2. The difference between a “good” and “best” tire in this category is minimal, and the consumer can expect very high-quality handling regardless of the model chosen.
3. The core of the market comprises models from all price segments, with a significant predominance of middle-class customers. The bulk of tires are in a very narrow range, within 1%.
4. The leaders are primarily premium tires, although some budget models are also available. This means that cheap tires are quite capable of competing with premium competitors.
5. The absolute outliers are budget tires, which indirectly confirm the hypothesis that lower prices are associated with worse performance (although without a significant lag).
6. The difference between the best and worst in the segment is about 2%, which can be almost unnoticeable.
7. Hidden Gem: Falken Pro, which beat all premium models.
8. Failure: Nokian, the only premium tire that ended up among the outsiders.
9. Although there is a price correlation, most tires provide consistently high performance, and the difference between premium and budget may not be noticeable for most users.

Wet Braking: Where Price Directly Translates to Safety

As the most critical safety test, wet braking sets the standard in the market. Premium models consistently prove their worth by delivering the shortest stopping distances, while budget tires confirm their risks by lagging significantly. This is a clear case where a higher price buys more safety. However, standout mid-range models like the Falken Pro can challenge the premium leaders, and some sub-premium brands, such as Toyo, can be a significant disappointment.

1. Wet braking is one of the most critical metrics, and tires have a significant impact on driving safety.
2. The difference in braking distance between the best and worst tires can be up to 12 meters (23.6% variation, with a conditional reference braking distance of 40 meters from 80 km/h). However, these are extreme values.
3. On average, the difference between the typical best and the typical worst tire is reduced to 5 meters (9% variation). This is a smaller gap, but it can still be critical in an extreme situation.
4. Most tires in the “core market” (excluding absolute leaders and outsiders) show a spread in braking distances of up to 3 meters (7% variation).
5. The leaders in wet braking are mainly premium models. This confirms the hypothesis of a price correlation: “higher price = shorter braking distance”.
6. The outsiders are mostly budget models, which also confirms the common belief that cheap tires have worse braking on wet roads.
7. Hidden Gem: Falken Pro, a mid-range model that ranks second in the group and beats almost all premium models.
8. Biggest Disappointment: Toyo is a sub-premium tire that ended up in the underdog group among budget Chinese models.

Wet Handling: Predictable Leaders and Surprising Results

While most all-season tires offer respectable wet handling, a clear performance gap separates the best from the rest. Premium brands predictably lead, confirming that price often correlates with better grip. However, the segment is full of surprises: some budget models, like Giti/GT Radial, show impressive results, while the premium Crossclimate 2 disappoints with below-average performance, proving that a brand name alone doesn’t guarantee top-tier wet handling.

1. All-season tires demonstrate good wet handling, as indicated by a relatively high overall median performance.
2. The difference between the best and worst tires on the market exceeds an 11% variation. At a reference speed of 80 km/h, this can result in a difference of approximately ~9 km/h, which in practice can lead to a noticeable loss of control, especially when driving actively or at high speeds. However, these are extreme values.
3. On average, the performance difference between a typical best and typical worst tire is a variance of 5.3%, or about 4.2 km/h. This difference may not be very noticeable at moderate speeds during everyday driving, but it becomes significant at the limits of performance. Drivers will experience this as less precise and slower steering responses, along with an earlier onset of sliding during cornering.
4. Most tires in the “core market” (excluding absolute leaders and outliers) show an even narrower spread – no more than 2.64km/h (3.3% variation). This category encompasses models from all price segments, with the middle class prevailing.
5. The leaders in wet handling are mainly premium tires, occupying the top places in the overall group, which confirms the hypothesis “more expensive = better”. However, two budget models (Giti, GT Radial) can also be found among the leaders, although their impressive result is based on a limited number of tests. This shows that good handling is not the exclusive prerogative of expensive models.
6. The outsiders are mainly budget models, which confirms the observation that “cheap tires provide worse handling.” It is worth noting that the bottom quartile also includes middle-class models, and the sub-premium Toyo tire proved to be unexpectedly close to the threshold of outsiders, indicating the presence of “failures” among more expensive models as well.
7. Hidden Gem: Cheap Giti/GT Radial tires showed very decent results.
8. Biggest Disappointment: The premium Michelin Crossclimate performed below average for its class, particularly in wet handling, which came as a surprise.

Aquaplaning Resistance: A Clear Divide Between Price Tiers

Aquaplaning resistance is a critical safety area where premium and mid-range tires demonstrate a significant advantage. The performance drop-off in the budget segment is substantial, confirming that cheaper tires pose a higher risk in heavy rain. While a specialized mid-range model like Uniroyal excels and outperforms most premium brands, the poor performance of a sub-premium brand like Yokohama shows that simply avoiding the lowest price tier isn’t a guarantee of safety.

1. Aquaplaning resistance is a crucial safety parameter, particularly in heavy rain or when driving through deep puddles.
2. The float speed difference between the best and worst tyres on the market can be ~9.6km/h (12% variation at a reference speed of 80 km/h). These are absolute extremes that highlight the potential risk.
3. On average, the difference between the typical best and the typical worst tire is reduced to 6.8 km/h 8.5% variation). This is still significant and can lead to a noticeable loss of control.
4. The bulk of the market (excluding absolute leaders and outliers) indicates that the float speed gap is approximately 4.8 km/h (6% variation). This category includes models from all price segments.
5. The top 25% of results consist of the mid-price and premium tires. This indicates that high aquaplaning resistance is not exclusive to the premium class, which is a positive sign for the mid-range segment. However, there is a significant and critical difference between the premium/mid-range and budget segments, where performance drops significantly, increasing the risks.
6. The outliers group consists predominantly of budget tires, which confirms the hypothesis that “cheap tires provide worse aquaplaning.” Choosing tires from this segment is associated with increased risk on wet roads. It is worth noting that sub-premium Yokohama can also be found in the bottom quartile, which indicates possible failures among more expensive models as well.
7. Hidden Gem: The Uniroal, and aquaplaning-focused model, performs better than most premium models, making it an outstanding choice for wet road safety
8. Biggest Disappointment: The Yokohama, positioned as a sub-premium tire, surprisingly finds itself in the lower quartile, performing on par with many budget tires in aquaplaning resistance.
9. For drivers who frequently drive in heavy rain or on roads with the potential for puddles, choosing a tire in the Premium or Mid-range class with high aquaplaning performance is a critical safety consideration.

Snow Braking: Where Price Doesn’t Matter and Budgets Lead

Snow braking completely upends the typical tire hierarchy. Price is not an indicator of performance, as representatives from all segments—premium, mid-range, and budget—are found among both leaders and outsiders. Most impressively, budget models like Giti/GT Radial take the top spots, outperforming everyone. Conversely, some premium tires like the Vredestein disappoint, proving that for snow, you can’t judge a tire by its brand or price tag.

1. Generally, all-season tires perform very well in snow braking, as indicated by their high median performance.
2. The variation in snow braking distance between the best and worst tires can reach up to 2.5 meters, which is a 13.2% difference based on a reference distance of 20 meters at 40 km/h. However, these numbers represent extreme cases.
3. On average, the typical best all-season tire stops 1.65 meters shorter, a 7% variation, compared to the typical worst model.
4. If you look at the middle of the pack, there is a very low spread in the market, with only a 1-meter braking distance difference, or a 4.36% variation.
5. Excellent braking performance on snow is not the prerogative of exclusively expensive tires. The top group consists of representatives from all three price segments. What is especially noteworthy is that the first two places are occupied by budget models (however, their impressive data is based on a limited number of tests)
6. The outsiders are also represented by tires from all price segments, which further confirms that in snow braking, a higher price does not always mean better performance.
7. Despite the overall high quality, the premium segment is hardly the clear leader in snow braking. It is present in all four quartiles and faces many strong competitors from other price categories.
8. The mid-range segment as a whole shows solid results and is only slightly inferior to the premium models, offering excellent options.
9. Hidden Gem: Giti / GT – These budget models have become real leaders in snow braking, occupying the first two places in the overall ranking. (Important: their results are based on a limited number of tests; further verification is recommended.)
10. Disappointment: The premium-class Vredestein surprisingly scored in the bottom 25% for snow braking, a noticeable compromise for a tire in this class.

Snow Handling: Technology and Price Prove Their Worth

In snow handling, a clear correlation emerges between price and performance, with premium tires offering superior and more predictable control. Budget models generally lag, confirming they are less reliable in these conditions. The influence of parent-company technology is a significant factor, with mid-range brands such as Kleber and BFGoodrich leveraging Michelin’s expertise to outperform most of their competitors. However, a sub-premium price isn’t a guarantee, as brands like Vredestein and Toyo underperform compared to their cheaper rivals.

• All-season tires generally demonstrate good snow handling results, with high homogeneity among most models, providing an acceptable and predictable level of control.
• The difference in show handling between the best and worst tires on the market is approximately 3.4 km/h (6.8% variation at 50 km/h, for reference). This indicates a moderate spread of performance even in extreme cases.
• On average, the difference between the typical best and the typical worst tire is about 2.65km/h (5.3 percentage points).
• Most tires in the “core market” demonstrate a smaller gap, which is around 1.5km/h (3% variation). 
• The leaders are mainly premium tires, which occupy most of the positions in the top half of the rating, emphasizing the price correlation: “Expensive tires provide better handling on snow.”
• It is worth noting that among the top brands, Kleber and BFGoodrich, which are subsidiary brands of the leading company Michelin, also excel. This highlights the influence of the parent brand’s technological expertise on the performance of its more affordable models.
• Among the group of outsiders are mainly budget models, which confirms the hypothesis “budget all-season tires have worse handling on snow”.
• Hidden Gem: Kleber and BFGoodrich, two middle-class tires, outperform most premium models in snow handling, offering comparable quality at a more affordable price. Their success is a clear example of the influence of the parent brand’s advanced technologies.
• Disappointment: Vredstein and Toyo, two sub-premium models, performed below market average in snow handling, falling behind most of their more affordable competitors.

Snow Traction: High Variability and Unpredictable Results

Snow traction is a highly variable discipline where price is not a reliable guide. While premium tires have a slightly better average performance, the field is wide open. Some premium and sub-premium models surprisingly fall into the outsider group, while budget models can achieve outstanding results. This is proven by the Giti, a budget tire that outperformed nearly all competitors, and the sub-premium Toyo, which was a significant disappointment.

1. The snow traction of All-Season tires is highly variable.
2. The difference between the worst and best tire on the market can be up to 390 Newtons (14% variation, with a reference of 2800 Newton), which can have a significant impact on your ability to get going in snow or on a slope. But these are extreme cases.
3. On average, the difference between the typically best and typically worst model is about 280 Newton (10% variation), which is also a significant difference in effort.
4. Most tires on the market demonstrate a more balanced and closer performance, with a difference of about 160 Newtons (5.7%).
5. High traction is not limited to premium models: tires across all three price segments can achieve high traction. However, premium tires typically have a higher average performance and often surpass the market median, underscoring the common correlation between price and quality.
6. The outsider group surprisingly provides a variety of mid-range and premium/sub-premium models. Meanwhile, most budget tires are primarily found in the third quartile (below the median but above the lowest 25%).
7. Disappointment: Toyo, this sub-premium tire demonstrated inferior snow traction results, ultimately placing it in the outsider group among budget models. This is a significant compromise for a brand in this price category.
8. Hidden Gem: Giti, a budget model that took third place in the overall ranking for snow traction, outperformed almost all premium and mid-range tires. This is clear proof that outstanding performance can be achieved on a budget. (Important: this data is based on a limited number of tests.)

Noise: Challenging Stereotypes and Redefining Comfort

Contrary to popular belief, a high price does not guarantee a quiet ride in all-season tires. Budget-friendly models often lead in comfort, with brands like GT Radial proving to be exceptionally quiet. Meanwhile, some premium tires can be surprisingly noisy, as seen with the disappointing result from Bridgestone. This shows that for buyers prioritizing comfort, looking beyond brand status and price is essential to find a truly quiet tire.

1. When evaluating noise levels, it’s essential to understand that decibels (dB) are measured on a logarithmic scale, not a linear one. This means that even a small change in dB can be perceived by the ear as a significant increase in loudness. For instance, the difference between 70 dB and 72.5 dB is not just a slight increase; it’s perceived as about a quarter louder.
2. The difference between the quietest and noisiest tires on the market can be as much as 2.6dB (3.5% variation, with a reference value of 71dB), which the ear perceives as approximately 30% louder. But these are extreme cases.
3. On average, the difference between the typical best and the typical worst tire is about 1.2 dB (1.5% variation), which can be subjectively perceived as up to 15% louder.
4. Most tires in the “core market” have a spread of about 0.8dB (1% variation). The ear perceives this difference as a 10% variation in volume, which is barely noticeable in real-world conditions.
5. Budget tires often lead the pack in terms of noise levels, which is surprising and counter to the common belief that “cheap tires are always louder.” This suggests that low noise levels are not exclusive to expensive tires; they can also be found across all price ranges.
6. Many premium tires, along with numerous mid-range models, have lower-than-average noise levels; however, some premium models are very quiet.
7. Hidden Gem: The budget GT Radial scored 100% in noise performance (albeit in a limited number of tests), becoming a real leader in quietness and disproving stereotypes about budget tires.
8. Disappointment: The premium Bridgestone scored in the bottom 25% for noise, which may come as an unpleasant surprise to buyers expecting absolute comfort from expensive models.

Rolling Resistance: Where Price is Not a Guide

Fuel efficiency in all-season tires completely defies the “price equals quality” logic. Both highly efficient and inefficient models are found across all price segments—premium, mid-range, and budget. This is proven by budget models like Giti and GT Radial, which deliver exceptional, premium-level efficiency. At the same time, the sub-premium Yokohama sits at the very bottom of the rankings, highlighting that a higher price does not guarantee lower fuel consumption.

1. The fuel economy of tires has a direct impact on a car’s fuel consumption, and both highly efficient and less fuel-efficient models are available on the market. However, this impact is highly dependent on factors such as the vehicle’s drive type (ICE or EV) and its base fuel economy.
2. The difference between the best and worst tyres is approximately 2.2 kg/t (22.5% variation), which could be equivalent to a fuel savings of 0.3-0.4 l/100 km for internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and 6-8% of the range for electric vehicles (EVs). But this is in extreme cases.
3. On average, the difference in rolling resistance between the typically best and the worst tyre is 1.4 kg/t (14.2%). For petrol and diesel cars, this corresponds to a reduction in consumption of 0.2-0.28 liters per 100 kilometers, and for electric vehicles, approximately 4.2-7% of the mileage.
4. Simultaneously, the efficiency difference in the core market is approximately 1 kg/t (10.3%), corresponding to 0.15-0.2 liters per 100 km for internal combustion engines (ICE) and 3-5% for electric vehicles.
5. The top performers in fuel efficiency are primarily premium tires; however, the highest 25% of ratings also includes numerous models from the budget and mid-range segments. This indicates that low fuel consumption is not solely the domain of expensive tires.
6. The outsiders also include tires from different price segments, but unexpectedly, the middle class prevails. Sub-premium Yokohama was in the very last place, which is a striking example of the lack of direct price correlation in this discipline. This highlights the absence of a clear price correlation and disproves the conventional wisdom that “cheap all-season tires use more fuel.” Each group contains both efficient and inefficient models, regardless of their price.
7. Hidden Gem: Two budget models, Giti and GT Radial, deliver exceptional fuel efficiency, comparable to many top premium options. This is a clear example of how low price does not always mean a compromise on fuel efficiency.
8. Disappointment: The sub-premium Yokohama ended up at the bottom of the fuel economy rankings, which was a surprise and highlights that a high price does not guarantee fuel efficiency.

Wear Resistance: A Huge Divide and a Surprising Champion

Durability is a key differentiator in all-season tires, where the right choice can double a tire’s lifespan. While premium models generally offer better longevity, confirming a loose price correlation, the segment is upended by the budget-friendly Nexen, which stands as the undisputed leader in wear resistance. This, combined with the disappointing result of the premium Pirelli, proves that while price can be a guide, it is not a guarantee of a long-lasting tire.

1. Wear resistance is one of the areas where there is the most significant variation in tire performance, which can have a substantial impact on tire life and overall cost of ownership.
2. The difference in potential mileage between the most and the least wear-resistant tire can be around 28,000 km (54.25% variation, with a reference mileage of 60,000 km). This means that choosing a poor model can cut the life of a tire by more than half. However, this is in extreme values.
3. Overall, the difference between the typically best and the typically worst tires is smaller – about 13,000 km (22% variation), which is still a significant spread in any case.
4. Most tires in the “core market” also have a high variation in performance. The difference between them is about 8400 km (15.5% variation). This suggests that even among the bulk of models, wear resistance varies greatly.
5. The vast majority of tires in the top 25% of results are premium models, and in general, the premium class predominates in the top half of the rating. However, the budget Nexen is in first place by a significant margin.
6. The group of outsiders is mainly budget models, but you can also find some mid-range and even premium tires in it.
7. In general, the hypothesis about the price correlation is confirmed: more expensive tires often exhibit higher wear resistance, while budget models tend to wear out faster. However, there are exceptions, and both poor and strong models are found in each segment.
8. Hidden gem: The Budget Nexen is the absolute leader in wear resistance, significantly surpassing all tires on the market, including premium ones. This is clear proof that durability can be available at an unexpectedly low price.
9. Disappointment: The premium-class Pirelli finished in the bottom 25% of wear results, a significant compromise and a surprise for its price point

FAQ

Q: What is the main compromise of all-season tires?

A: They are a compromise between summer and winter performance. They will never be as good as the best summer tires in high heat or as effective as the best winter tires on ice and deep snow. They are a universal solution for mild climates.

Q: Does buying a premium brand guarantee the best performance in all conditions?

A: No. While premium tires often lead in critical disciplines like wet and dry braking, they can deliver average or even poor results in other areas such as snow braking, noise levels, or wear resistance.

Q: Is it a good idea to buy budget all-season tires?

A: It’s a gamble. You might find a true ‘hidden gem’ for a specific task (like Nexen for wear resistance or Giti for snow traction). Still, on average, they significantly underperform in critical wet safety tests.

Q: Which tires perform best on snow?

A: Price is not a reliable indicator in this case. In snow braking and traction, budget models can outperform premium ones. However, in snow handling (a more complex parameter), technologically advanced premium brands and their sub-brands (like Kleber, BFGoodrich) are usually more stable.

Q: Which all-season tires last the longest?

A: The results might surprise you. While premium tires are generally more durable on average, a budget model can sometimes be the absolute leader in wear resistance. This category has a huge variation in potential mileage between the best and worst tires.

Q: Are expensive tires always the quietest?

A: Not at all. In the all-season category, this stereotype is often proven wrong. Budget models can be among the quietest, while some premium tires are disappointingly loud.

Q: Where is the biggest safety risk with all-season tires?

A: In wet conditions (braking, handling, aquaplaning). This is where the performance gap between premium and good mid-range tires, and budget tires, becomes most critical for safety.

Q: Do more expensive tires save more fuel?

A: There is no clear correlation. Efficient and inefficient models are found in all price segments. A sub-premium tire can be the worst in the ranking, while a budget tire can be one of the best.

Q: Should I trust sub-brands like Kleber or BFGoodrich?

A: Yes. They often utilize the advanced technologies of their parent companies (in this case, Michelin) and can offer near-premium performance at a more affordable price, especially in snow-related disciplines.

Q: So, how should I choose in the end?

A: Define your main priority. For safety in a rainy climate, consider the leaders in wet performance tests (typically premium brands). For durability or specific snow capabilities, search for ‘hidden champions’ which could be in any price segment. Always check test results for the specific model, not just the brand name.

Disclaimer: how this table is structured.

1. The table presents the latest All Season Tires, with 3PMSF sertification.
2. All of them have been independently tested, and open performance data is available for detailed analysis.
3. The table does not accurately reflect the entire market, as many models did not participate in the tests and therefore lack data for analysis.
4. Each tire is assigned a performance rating based on its performance in specific areas, which is determined through multiple tests. This provides a more reliable average indicator. However, some tire models may have been tested only once, which could lead to inaccuracies in their ratings.
5. The values in the table update automatically when new tests are added to our database.